HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Dolliver, H. Articles by Noll, S. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Dolliver, H. Articles by Noll, S. Agricola Articles by Dolliver, H. Articles by Noll, S. Related Collections Best Management Practices Pharmaceuticals Organic Compounds Water Pollution Animal Waste

TECHNICAL REPORTS

Organic Compounds in the Environment

Antibiotic Degradation during Manure Composting

^a Department of Plant and Earth Science, Univ. of Wisconsin-River Falls, 410 S. 3rd St., River Falls, WI, 54022
^b Dep. of Soil, Water, and Climate, Univ. of Minnesota, 1991 Upper Buford Circle, St. Paul, MN 55108
^c Dep. of Animal Science, Univ. of Minnesota, 1364 Eckles Ave., St. Paul, MN 55108

^* Corresponding author (sgupta{at}umn.edu).

Received for publication July 26, 2007. On-farm manure management practices, such as composting, may provide a practical and economical option for reducing antibiotic concentrations in manure before land application, thereby minimizing the potential for environmental contamination. The objective of this study was to quantify degradation of chlortetracycline, monensin, sulfamethazine, and tylosin in spiked turkey (Meleagris gallopavo) litter during composting. Three manure composting treatments were evaluated: a control treatment (manure pile with no disturbance or adjustments after initial mixing), a managed compost pile (weekly mixing and moisture content adjustments), and vessel composting. Despite significant differences in temperature, mass, and nutrient losses between the composting treatments and the control, there was no difference in antibiotic degradation among the treatments. Chlortetracycline concentrations declined rapidly during composting, whereas monensin and tylosin concentrations declined gradually in all three treatments. There was no degradation of sulfamethazine in any of treatments. At the conclusion of the composting period (22–35 d), there was >99% reduction in chlortetracycline, whereas monensin and tylosin reduction ranged from 54 to 76% in all three treatments. Assuming first-order decay, the half-lives for chlortetracycline, monensin, and tylosin were 1, 17, and 19 d, respectively. These data suggest that managed compositing in a manure pile or in a vessel is not better than the control treatment in degrading certain antibiotics in manure. Therefore, low-level manure management, such as stockpiling, after an initial adjustment of water content may be a practical and economical option for livestock producers in reducing antibiotic levels in manure before land application.

Abbreviations: ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay

This article has been cited by other articles:

				T. W. Alexander, T. Reuter, R. Sharma, L. J. Yanke, E. Topp, and T. A. McAllister Longitudinal Characterization of Resistant Escherichia coli in Fecal Deposits from Cattle Fed Subtherapeutic Levels of Antimicrobials Appl. Envir. Microbiol., November 15, 2009; 75(22): 7125 - 7134. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. A.S. Dolliver and S. C. Gupta Antibiotic Losses from Unprotected Manure Stockpiles J. Environ. Qual., May 1, 2008; 37(3): 1238 - 1244. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]