JEQ Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 20 February 2008
Published in J Environ Qual 37:725-735 (2008)
DOI: 10.2134/jeq2007.0351
© 2008 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Larney, F. J.
Right arrow Articles by McAllister, T. A.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Larney, F. J.
Right arrow Articles by McAllister, T. A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Larney, F. J.
Right arrow Articles by McAllister, T. A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Industrial Waste
Right arrow Irrigation
Right arrow Nutrient Cycling
Right arrow Nutrient Management

TECHNICAL REPORTS

Waste Management

Physical and Chemical Changes during Composting of Wood Chip–Bedded and Straw-Bedded Beef Cattle Feedlot Manure

Francis J. Larney*, Andrew F. Olson, Jim J. Miller, Paul R. DeMaere, Francis Zvomuya and Tim A. McAllister

Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Research Centre, 5403 1st Ave. S., Lethbridge, AB, Canada T1J 4B1. Lethbridge Research Centre contribution no. 38707023

* Corresponding author (larneyf{at}agr.gc.ca).

Received for publication July 4, 2007. In the 1990s, restrictions on incineration encouraged the forest industry in western Canada to develop new uses for their wood residuals by product. One such use was as a replacement for cereal straw bedding in southern Alberta's beef cattle (Bos taurus) feedlot industry. However, use of carbon (C)-rich bedding, such as wood chips, had implications for subsequent composting of the feedlot manure, a practice that was being increasingly adopted. In a 3-yr study, we compared composting of wood chip–bedded manure (WBM) and barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) straw-bedded manure (SBM). There were no significant differences in temperature regimes of SBM and WBM, indicating similar rates of successful composting. Of 17 physical and chemical parameters, five showed significant (P < 0.10) differences due to bedding at the outset of composting (Day 0), and 11 showed significant differences at final sampling (Day 124). During composting (10 sampling times), seven parameters showed significant bedding effects, 16 showed significant time effects, and four showed a Bedding x Time interaction. Significantly lower (P < 0.10) losses of nitrogen (N) occurred with WBM (19%) compared with SBM (34%), which has positive implications for air quality and use as a soil amendment. Other advantages of WBM compost included significantly higher total C (333 vs. 210 kg Mg–1 for SBM) and inorganic N (1.3 vs. 1.0 kg Mg–1 for SBM) and significantly lower total phosphorus (4.5 vs. 5.3 kg Mg–1 for SBM). Our results showed that wood chip bedding should not be a problem for subsequent composting of the manure after pen cleaning. In combination with other benefits, our findings should encourage the adoption of wood chips over straw as a bedding choice for southern Alberta feedlots.

Abbreviations: BD, bulk density • DM, dry matter • EC, electrical conductivity • GHG, greenhouse gas • IN, inorganic nitrogen • KEP, Kelowna-extractable phosphorus • OM, organic matter • PEP, percent extractable phosphorus • PIN, percent inorganic nitrogen • SBM, straw-bedded manure • TC, total carbon • TN, total nitrogen • TP, total phosphorus • VL, volume loss • WBM, wood chip-bedded manure • WC, water content







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Copyright © 2008 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.