JEQ Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 1 March 2008
Published in J Environ Qual 37:437-447 (2008)
DOI: 10.2134/jeq2007.0344
© 2008 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Royer, T. V.
Right arrow Articles by Whiles, M. R.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Royer, T. V.
Right arrow Articles by Whiles, M. R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Royer, T. V.
Right arrow Articles by Whiles, M. R.
Related Collections
Right arrow Surface Water Quality
Right arrow Water Quality
Right arrow Ecosystem Management

TECHNICAL REPORTS

Surface Water Quality

Assessment of Chlorophyll-a as a Criterion for Establishing Nutrient Standards in the Streams and Rivers of Illinois

Todd V. Royera,*, Mark B. Davidb, Lowell E. Gentryb,c, Corey A. Mitchellb, Karen M. Starksb, Thomas Heatherly, IId and Matt R. Whilesd

a School of Public & Environmental Affairs, Indiana Univ., Bloomington, IN 47405
b Dep. of Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences, Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801
c current address: Dep. of Crop and Soil Sciences, Michigan State Univ., East Lansing, MI 48824
d Dep. of Zoology and Center for Ecology, Southern Illinois Univ., Carbondale, IL 62901

* Corresponding author (troyer{at}indiana.edu).

Received for publication June 28, 2007. Nutrient enrichment is a frequently cited cause for biotic impairment of streams and rivers in the USA. Efforts are underway to develop nutrient standards in many states, but defensible nutrient standards require an empirical relationship between nitrogen (N) or phosphorus (P) concentrations and some criterion that relates nutrient levels to the attainment of designated uses. Algal biomass, measured as chlorophyll-a (chl-a), is a commonly proposed criterion, yet nutrient–chl-a relationships have not been well documented in Illinois at a state-wide scale. We used state-wide surveys of >100 stream and river sites to assess the applicability of chl-a as a criterion for establishing nutrient standards for Illinois. Among all sites, the median total P and total N concentrations were 0.185 and 5.6 mg L–1, respectively, during high-discharge conditions. During low-discharge conditions, median total P concentration was 0.168 mg L–1, with 25% of sites having a total P of ≥0.326 mg L–1. Across the state, 90% of the sites had sestonic chl-a values of ≤35 µg L–1, and watershed area was the best predictor of sestonic chl-a. During low discharge there was a significant correlation between sestonic chl-a and total P for those sites that had canopy cover ≤25% and total P of ≤0.2 mg L–1. Results suggest sestonic chl-a may be an appropriate criterion for the larger rivers in Illinois but is inappropriate for small rivers and streams. Coarse substrate to support benthic chl-a occurred in <50% of the sites we examined; a study using artificial substrates did not reveal a relationship between chl-a accrual and N or P concentrations. For many streams and rivers in Illinois, nutrients may not be the limiting factor for algal biomass due to the generally high nutrient concentrations and the effects of other factors, such as substrate conditions and turbidity.

Abbreviations: chl-a, chlorophyll-a • DRP, dissolved reactive phosphorus • Q, discharge







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Copyright © 2008 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.