HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Gill, L. W. Articles by Johnston, P. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Gill, L. W. Articles by Johnston, P. J. Agricola Articles by Gill, L. W. Articles by Johnston, P. J. Related Collections Field-Scale Studies Microorganisms Soil Pollution Water Pollution

TECHNICAL REPORTS

Vadose Zone Processes and Chemical Transport

The Treatment Performance of Different Subsoils in Ireland Receiving On-Site Wastewater Effluent

Dep. of Civil, Structural and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Dublin, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland

^* Corresponding author (gilll{at}tcd.ie).

Received for publication February 5, 2007. Current Irish guidelines require a comprehensive site assessment of a percolation area for wastewater disposal before planning permission is granted for dwellings in rural areas. For a site to be deemed suitable, the subsoil must have a percolation value equivalent to a field saturated hydraulic conductivity in the range 0.08 to 4.2 m d^–1 using a falling head percolation test. A minimum of 1.2 m of unsaturated subsoil must also exist below the invert of the percolation area receiving effluent from a septic tank (or 0.6 m for secondary treated effluent). During a 2-yr period, the three-dimensional performance of four percolation areas treating domestic wastewater was monitored. At each site samples were taken at 0, 10, and 20 m along each of the four percolation trenches at depths of 0.3, 0.6, and 1.0 m below each trench to ascertain the attenuation effects of the unsaturated subsoil. The two sites with septic tanks installed performed at least as well as the other two sites with secondary treatment systems installed and appeared to discharge a better quality effluent in terms of nutrient load. An average of 2.1 and 6.8 g total N d^–1 remained after passing through 1-m depth of subsoil beneath the trenches receiving septic tank effluent compared with 12.7 and 16.7 g total N d^–1 on the sites receiving secondary effluent. The research also indicates that the septic tank effluent was of an equivalent quality to the secondary treated effluent in terms of indicator bacteria (E. coli) after percolating through 0.6-m depth of unsaturated subsoil.

Abbreviations: BOD, biochemical oxygen demand • COD, chemical oxygen demand • cfu, colony forming units • EPA, Environmental Protection Agency • LTAR, long-term acceptance rate • MPN, most probable number • SE, secondary treated effluent • STE, septic tank effluent