JEQ Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 16 October 2007
Published in J Environ Qual 36:1627-1634 (2007)
DOI: 10.2134/jeq2007.0018
© 2007 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brown, S.L.
Right arrow Articles by Basta, N.T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Brown, S.L.
Right arrow Articles by Basta, N.T.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Brown, S.L.
Right arrow Articles by Basta, N.T.
Related Collections
Right arrow Mining Wastes
Right arrow Ecosystem Restoration
Right arrow Heavy Metals

TECHNICAL REPORTS

Heavy Metals in the Environment

Field Test of In Situ Soil Amendments at the Tar Creek National Priorities List Superfund Site

S.L. Browna,*, H. Comptonb and N.T. Bastac

a Forest Resources, Univ. of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195
b Environmental Response Team, USEPA Edison NJ 08837
c School of Environment and Natural Resources, The Ohio State Univ., Columbus, OH 43210

* Corresponding author (slb{at}u.washington.edu).

Received for publication December 23, 2006. A range of soil amendments including diammonium phosphate fertilizer (DAP), municipal biosolids (BS), biosolids compost, and Al- and Fe-based water treatment residuals were tested on Pb-, Zn-, and Cd-contaminated yard soils and tailings at the Tar Creek NPL site in Oklahoma to determine if amendments could restore a vegetative cover and reduce metal availability in situ. For the yard soils, all amendments reduced bioaccessible (assessed with a physiologic-based extraction method) Pb, with reductions ranging from 35% (BS+Al, DAP 0.5%, DAP+Compost+Al) to 57% (Compost+Al). Plant Zn (Cynadon dactylon L.) and NH4NO3–extractable Cd and Zn were also reduced by a number of amendments. For the tailings, all amendments excluding BS reduced bioaccessible Pb, with the largest reductions observed in the DAP 3% and DAP3%+BS treatments (75 and 84%). Plant growth was suppressed in all treatments that contained DAP for the first season, with the highest growth in the treatments that included compost and biosolids. In the second year, growth was vigorous for all treatments. Plant Zn and Cd and extractable metal concentration were also reduced. A number of treatments were identified that reduced bioaccessible Pb and sustained a healthy plant with reduced metal concentrations. For the yard soil, Compost+Al was the most effective treatment tested. For the tailings, BS+DAP 1% was the most effective treatment tested. These results indicate that in situ amendments offer a remedial alternative for the Tar Creek site.

Abbreviations: BS, biosolids • DAP, diammonium phosphate • EC, electrical conductivity • WTR, water treatment residuals







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Copyright © 2007 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.