HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by McMillan, R. Articles by Biryukova, O. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by McMillan, R. Articles by Biryukova, O. GeoRef GeoRef Citation Agricola Articles by McMillan, R. Articles by Biryukova, O. Related Collections Soil Microbiology Remediation Soil Organic Matter Soil Chemistry

TECHNICAL REPORTS

Nitrogen Mineralization and Microbial Activity in Oil Sands Reclaimed Boreal Forest Soils

Dep. of Renewable Resources, Univ. of Alberta, Edmonton, AB Canada T6G 2E3

^* Corresponding author (sylvie.quideau{at}ualberta.ca).

Received for publication December 9, 2006. Organic materials including a peat-mineral mix (PM), a forest floor-mineral mix (L/S), and a combination of the two (L/PM) were used to cap mineral soil materials at surface mine reclamation sites in the Athabasca oil sands region of northeastern Alberta, Canada. The objective of this study was to test whether LFH provided an advantage over peat by stimulating microbial activity and providing more available nitrogen for plant growth. Net nitrification, ammonification, and N mineralization rates were estimated from field incubations using buried bags. In situ gross nitrification and ammonification rates were determined using the ¹⁵N isotope pool dilution technique, and microbial biomass C (MBC) and N (MBN) were measured by the chloroform fumigation-extraction method. All reclaimed sites had lower MBC and MBN, and lower net ammonification and net mineralization rates than a natural forest site (NLFH) used as a control, but the reclamation treatment using LFH material by itself had higher gross and net nitrification rates. A positive correlation between in situ moisture content, dissolved organic N, MBC, and MBN was observed, which led us to conduct a moisture manipulation experiment in the laboratory. With the exception of the MBN for the L/S treatment, none of the reclamation treatments ever reached the levels of the natural site during this experiment. However, materials from reclamation treatments that incorporated LFH showed higher respiration rates, MBC, and MBN than the PM treatment, indicating that the addition of LFH as an organic amendment may stimulate microbial activity as compared to the use of peat alone.

Abbreviations: RNI, relative nitrification index • MBC, microbial biomass carbon • MBN, microbial biomass nitrogen • DOC, dissolved organic carbon • DON, dissolved organic nitrogen • TDN, total dissolved nitrogen • L/S, forest floor-mineral mix over secondary • L/PM, forest floor-mineral mix over peat-mineral mix • PM, peat-mineral mix • NLFH, natural (undisturbed) forest floor layer