| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
USEPA, Office of Research and Development, National Risk Management Research Lab., Ground Water and Ecosystems Restoration Div., 919 Kerr Research Dr., Ada, OK 74821. S.K. Reynolds, Jr., current address, Dep. of Biology, Lake Erie College, 391 W. Washington St., Painesville, OH 44077. M.D. McCutchen, current address, Homer L. Dodge Dep. of Physics and Astronomy, Univ. of Oklahoma, 440 W. Brooks St., Norman, OK 73019
* Corresponding author (mayer.paul{at}epa.gov)
Received for publication October 24, 2006. Riparian buffers, the vegetated region adjacent to streams and wetlands, are thought to be effective at intercepting and reducing nitrogen loads entering water bodies. Riparian buffer width is thought to be positively related to nitrogen removal effectiveness by influencing nitrogen retention or removal. We surveyed the scientific literature containing data on riparian buffers and nitrogen concentration in streams and groundwater to identify trends between nitrogen removal effectiveness and buffer width, hydrological flow path, and vegetative cover. Nitrogen removal effectiveness varied widely. Wide buffers (>50 m) more consistently removed significant portions of nitrogen entering a riparian zone than narrow buffers (0–25 m). Buffers of various vegetation types were equally effective at removing nitrogen but buffers composed of herbaceous and forest/herbaceous vegetation were more effective when wider. Subsurface removal of nitrogen was efficient, but did not appear to be related to buffer width, while surface removal of nitrogen was partly related to buffer width. The mass of nitrate nitrogen removed per unit length of buffer did not differ by buffer width, flow path, or buffer vegetation type. Our meta-analysis suggests that buffer width is an important consideration in managing nitrogen in watersheds. However, the inconsistent effects of buffer width and vegetation on nitrogen removal suggest that soil type, subsurface hydrology (e.g., soil saturation, groundwater flow paths), and subsurface biogeochemistry (organic carbon supply, nitrate inputs) also are important factors governing nitrogen removal in buffers.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  W. A. Pratt and T. R. Fox Streamside Management Zones Effectiveness for Protecting Water Quality after Forestland Application of Biosolids J. Environ. Qual., August 24, 2009; 38(5): 2106 - 2120. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. T. Walker, J. M. Vose, J. Knoepp, and C. D. Geron Recovery of Nitrogen Pools and Processes in Degraded Riparian Zones in the Southern Appalachians J. Environ. Qual., May 20, 2009; 38(4): 1391 - 1399. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 Yihe Lu, Liding Chen, and Bojie Fu Land-cover effects on red soil rehabilitation in China: a meta-analysis Progress in Physical Geography, October 1, 2008; 32(5): 491 - 502. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
X. Liu, X. Zhang, and M. Zhang Major Factors Influencing the Efficacy of Vegetated Buffers on Sediment Trapping: A Review and Analysis J. Environ. Qual., August 8, 2008; 37(5): 1667 - 1674. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M.G. Dosskey, M.J. Helmers, and D.E. Eisenhauer A design aid for determining width of filter strips Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, July 1, 2008; 63(4): 232 - 241. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| The SCI Journals | Agronomy Journal | Crop Science | |||
| Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education |
Vadose Zone Journal | ||||
| Soil Science Society of America Journal | Journal of Plant Registrations | The Plant Genome | |||
