HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Ogino, A. Articles by Kawashima, T. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Ogino, A. Articles by Kawashima, T. Agricola Articles by Ogino, A. Articles by Kawashima, T. Related Collections Industrial Waste Municipal Waste Air Pollution

TECHNICAL REPORTS

Waste Management

Environmental Impact Evaluation of Feeds Prepared from Food Residues Using Life Cycle Assessment

^a National Institute of Livestock and Grassland Science, 2 Ikenodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-0901, Japan
^b Graduate School of Agriculture, Kyoto Univ., Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8502, Japan

^* Corresponding author (aogino{at}affrc.go.jp)

Received for publication August 20, 2006. There is increasing concern about feeds prepared from food residues (FFR) from an environmental viewpoint; however, various forms of energy are consumed in the production of FFR. Environmental impacts of three scenarios were therefore investigated and compared using life cycle assessment (LCA): production of liquid FFR by sterilization with heat (LQ), production of dehydrated FFR by dehydration (DH), and disposal of food residues by incineration (IC). The functional unit was defined as 1 kg dry matter of produced feed standardized to a fixed energy content. The system boundaries included collection of food residues and production of feed from food residues. In IC, food residues are incinerated as waste, and thus the impacts of production and transportation of commercial concentrate feeds equivalent to the FFR in the other scenarios are included in the analysis. Our results suggested that the average amounts of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from LQ, DH, and IC were 268, 1073, and 1066 g of CO₂ equivalent, respectively. The amount of GHG emissions from LQ was remarkably small, indicating that LQ was effective for reducing the environmental impact of animal production. Although the average amount of GHG emissions from DH was nearly equal to that from IC, a large variation of GHG emissions was observed among the DH units. The energy consumption of the three scenarios followed a pattern similar to that of GHG emissions. The water consumption of the FFR-producing units was remarkably smaller than that of IC due to the large volumes of water consumed in forage crop production.

Abbreviations: DH, production of dehydrated FFR by dehydration • DM, dry matter • FFR, feed prepared from food residues • FU, functional unit • g CO₂ eq., g of CO₂ equivalent • GHG, greenhouse gas • IC, disposal of food residues by incineration • LCA, life cycle assessment • LQ, production of liquid FFR by heating • MC, moisture content • ME, metabolizable energy