JEQ Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 5 April 2007
Published in J Environ Qual 36:773-779 (2007)
DOI: 10.2134/jeq2006.0394
© 2007 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Varel, V. H.
Right arrow Articles by Wells, J. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Varel, V. H.
Right arrow Articles by Wells, J. E.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Varel, V. H.
Right arrow Articles by Wells, J. E.
Related Collections
Right arrow Animal Waste
Right arrow Microbial Processes
Right arrow Air Pollution

TECHNICAL REPORTS

Waste Management

Influence of Thymol and a Urease Inhibitor on Coliform Bacteria, Odor, Urea, and Methane from a Swine Production Manure Pit

Vincent H. Varel* and James E. Wells

USDA, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Meat Animal Research Center, P.O. Box 166, Clay Center, NE 68933-0166, USA

* Corresponding author (vince.varel{at}ars.usda.gov)

Received for publication September 21, 2006. Pathogens, ammonia, odor, and greenhouse gas emissions are serious environmental concerns associated with swine production. This study was conducted in two manure pits (33 000 L each) to determine the influence of 1.5 or 3.0 g thymol L–1 and 80 mg L–1 urease inhibitor amendments on urea accumulation, coliform bacteria, odor, and methane emission. Each experiment lasted 18 or 19 d, during which time 30 to 36 250-mL samples (six per day) were withdrawn from underneath each pit and analyzed for urea, thymol, volatile fatty acids, coliform bacteria, and Campylobacter. At the end of each experiment, six 50-g samples from each pit were placed in serum bottles, and gas volume and composition were determined periodically for 28 d. Compared with the control pit, volatile fatty acids production was reduced 64 and 100% for the thymol amendments of 1.5 and 3.0 g L–1, respectively. Viable coliform cells were reduced 4.68 and 5.88 log10 colony-forming units kg–1 of slurry for the 1.5 and 3.0 g thymol L–1, respectively, and Escherichia coli were reduced 4.67 and 5.01 log10 colony-forming units kg–1 of slurry, respectively. Campylobacter was not detected in the pits treated with thymol, in contrast to 63% of the samples being positive for the untreated pit. Urea accumulated in the treated pits from Day 3 to 6. Total gas production from serum bottles was reduced 65 and 76% for thymol amendments of 1.5 and 3.0 g L–1, respectively, and methane was reduced 78 and 93%, respectively. These results suggest that thymol markedly reduces pathogens, odor, and greenhouse gas emissions from a swine production facility. The urease inhibitor produced a temporary response in conserving urea.

Abbreviations: BUN, blood urea nitrogen • CAFO, confined animal feeding operation • CFU, colony-forming units • DM, dry matter • NBPT, N-(n-butyl) thiophosphoric triamide • VFA, volatile fatty acids







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Copyright © 2007 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.