JEQ Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 1 March 2007
Published in J Environ Qual 36:557-567 (2007)
DOI: 10.2134/jeq2006.0174
© 2007 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Parent, G.
Right arrow Articles by Laperrière, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Parent, G.
Right arrow Articles by Laperrière, J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Parent, G.
Right arrow Articles by Laperrière, J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Animal Waste
Right arrow Industrial Waste

TECHNICAL REPORTS

Waste Management

Precipitation of Liquid Swine Manure Phosphates Using Magnesium Smelting By-Products

Gaétan Parenta,*, Gilles Bélangera, Noura Ziadia, Jean-Pierre Delandb and Jean Laperrièreb

a Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Soils and Crops Research and Development Centre, 2560 Hochelaga Blvd., Quebec, QC, Canada G1V 2J3
b Norsk Hydro Canada Inc., 7000 Raoul-Duchesne Blvd., Bécancour, QC, Canada G9H 2V3

* Corresponding author (parentg{at}agr.gc.ca)

Received for publication May 2, 2006. Swine manure contains considerable amounts of total (P) and soluble phosphorus (PO4–P) which may increase the soil P content when applied in excess to crop requirements and, consequently, risk water eutrophication. The feasibility of using magnesium (Mg) from the by-product of electrolysis and foundries (BPEF) for the removal of P from liquid swine manure was studied by adding up to 3 g of Mg as BPEF per liter of nursery (NU) and grower-finisher (GF) swine manure in 25-L plastic buckets. Changes in P and other elements were monitored for up to 360 h. Small amounts of Mg as BPEF (0.5 and 1.0 g Mg L–1 manure) reduced the total P concentration of the liquid fraction by 70 to 95% of both manure types with respect to the control treatment of mixed raw manure. A settling period of 8 h or more was necessary to significantly reduce the liquid fraction's total P concentration for both manure types. Reduction of PO4–P varied from 96 to 100% in the liquid fractions for both manure types, which along with natural settling, explains most of the total P reduction in that fraction. The addition of BPEF did not influence the N content of manure. The low P liquid fraction can be safely applied to saturated P soils whereas the high P solid fraction offers the opportunity of transporting manure to agricultural soils deficient in P. Since N is conserved, both liquid and solid fractions could be valuable fertilizer manure by-products.

Abbreviations: BPEF, by-product of electrolysis and foundries • DM, dry matter • GF, grower-finisher swine manure • LSD, least significant difference • NU, nursery swine manure • PO4–P, water-soluble phosphorus




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
S. Pelletier, G. Belanger, G. F. Tremblay, M. H. Chantigny, and G. Allard
Dietary Cation Anion Difference and Tetany Index of Timothy Forage Fertilized with Liquid Swine Manure
Agron. J., January 11, 2008; 100(1): 213 - 220.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal Journal of Plant Registrations The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2007 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.