HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Larose, M. Articles by Engel, B. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Larose, M. Articles by Engel, B. Agricola Articles by Larose, M. Articles by Engel, B. Related Collections Water Quality Agricultural Pesticides Surface Water Quality

TECHNICAL REPORTS

Surface Water Quality

Hydrologic and Atrazine Simulation of the Cedar Creek Watershed Using the SWAT Model

^a Agronomy Dep., Purdue Univ., West Lafayette, IN 47907
^b USDA-ARS, National Soil Erosion Research Lab., 275 S. Russell Street, West Lafayette, IN 47907-2077
^c Agricultural and Biological Engineering, Purdue Univ., West Lafayette, IN 47907 USA

^* Corresponding author (gheathman{at}purdue.edu)

Received for publication April 17, 2006. One of the major factors contributing to surface water contamination in agricultural areas is the use of pesticides. The Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) is a hydrologic model capable of simulating the fate and transport of pesticides in an agricultural watershed. The SWAT model was used in this study to estimate stream flow and atrazine (2-chloro-4-(ethylamino)-6-(isopropylamino)-s-triazine) losses to surface water in the Cedar Creek Watershed (CCW) within the St. Joseph River Basin in northeastern Indiana. Model calibration and validation periods consisted of five and two year periods, respectively. The National Agricultural Statistics Survey (NASS) 2001 land cover classification and the Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database were used as model input data layers. Data from the St. Joseph River Watershed Initiative and the Soil and Water Conservation Districts of Allen, Dekalb, and Noble counties were used to represent agricultural practices in the watershed which included the type of crops grown, tillage practices, fertilizer, and pesticide application rates. Model results were evaluated based on efficiency coefficient values, standard statistical measures, and visual inspection of the measured and simulated hydrographs. The Nash and Sutcliffe model efficiency coefficients (E_NS) for monthly and daily stream flow calibration and validation ranged from 0.51 to 0.66. The E_NS values for atrazine calibration and validation ranged from 0.43 to 0.59. All E_NS values were within the range of acceptable model performance standards. The results of this study indicate that the model is an effective tool in capturing the dynamics of stream flow and atrazine concentrations on a large-scale agricultural watershed in the midwestern USA.

Abbreviations: CCW, Cedar Creek Watershed • E_NS, Nash and Sutcliffe model efficiency coefficients • HRUs, hydrologic response units • R², coefficient of determination • SCS CN, soil conservation service runoff curve number • SWAT, Soil and Water Assessment Tool

This article has been cited by other articles:

				G.C. Heathman, M. Larose, and J.C. Ascough II Soil and Water Assessment Tool evaluation of soil and land use geographic information system data sets on simulated stream flow Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, January 1, 2009; 64(1): 17 - 32. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G.C. Heathman, D.C. Flanagan, M. Larose, and B.W. Zuercher Application of the Soil and Water Assessment Tool and Annualized Agricultural Non-Point Source models in the St. Joseph River watershed Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, November 1, 2008; 63(6): 552 - 568. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C.W. Richardson, D.A. Bucks, and E.J. Sadler The Conservation Effects Assessment Project benchmark watersheds: Synthesis of preliminary findings Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, November 1, 2008; 63(6): 590 - 604. [Abstract] [PDF]