HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Hong, N. Articles by Sudduth, K. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Hong, N. Articles by Sudduth, K. A. Agricola Articles by Hong, N. Articles by Sudduth, K. A. Related Collections Ground Water Quality Nitrogen

TECHNICAL REPORTS

Ground Water Quality

Economically Optimal Nitrogen Rate Reduces Soil Residual Nitrate

^a Div. of Plant Science, Univ. of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211
^b USDA-NRCS, Columbia, MO 65203
^c USDA-ARS, Cropping Syst. and Water Quality Res. Unit, Columbia, MO 65211

^* Corresponding author (hongn{at}missouri.edu)

Received for publication May 2, 2006. Post-harvest residual soil NO₃–N (RSN) is susceptible to transfer to water resources. Practices that minimize RSN levels can reduce N loss to the environment. Our objectives were (i) to determine if the RSN after corn (Zea mays L.) harvest can be reduced if N fertilizer is applied at the economically optimal N rate (EONR) as compared to current producer practices in the midwestern USA and (ii) to compare RSN levels for N fertilizer rates below, at, and above the EONR. Six experiments were conducted in producer fields in three major soil areas (Mississippi Delta alluvial, deep loess, claypan) in Missouri over 2 yr. Predominant soil great groups were Albaqualfs, Argiudolls, Haplaquolls, and Fluvaquents. At four transects in each field, six treatment N rates from 0 to 280 kg N ha^–1 were applied, the EONR was determined, and the RSN was measured to a 0.9-m depth from five treatment plots. The EONR at sampling sites varied from 49 to 228 kg N ha^–1 depending on site and year. Estimated average RSN at the EONR was 33 kg N ha^–1 in the 0.9-m profile. This was at least 12 kg N ha^–1 lower than RSN at the producers' N rates. The RSN increased with increasing EONR (total N applied – EONR). This relationship was best modeled by a plateau-linear function, with a low RSN plateau at N rates well below the EONR. A linear increase in RSN began anywhere from 65 kg N ha^–1 below the EONR to 20 kg N ha^–1 above the EONR at the three sites with good data resolution near the EONR. Applying N rates in excess of the EONR produced elevated RSN values in all six experiments. Our results suggest that applying the EONR will produce environmental benefits in an economically sound manner, and that continued attempts to develop methods for accurately predicting EONR are justified.

Abbreviations: CP, claypan soil region • DL, deep loess soil region • EC_a, apparent bulk soil electrical conductivity • EONR, economically optimal N rate • MD, Mississippi delta soil region • PNR, the producers' N rates • RSN, post-harvest residual soil NO₃–N • EONR, the difference between total N applied and the EONR • 00, 2000 • 01, 2001