JEQ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 27 October 2006
Published in J Environ Qual 35:2186-2194 (2006)
DOI: 10.2134/jeq2005.0476
© 2006 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shipitalo, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Owens, L. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shipitalo, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Owens, L. B.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Shipitalo, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Owens, L. B.
Related Collections
Right arrow Pesticides
Right arrow Best Management Practices
Right arrow Agricultural Pesticides

TECHNICAL REPORTS

Surface Water Quality

Tillage System, Application Rate, and Extreme Event Effects on Herbicide Losses in Surface Runoff

Martin J. Shipitalo* and Lloyd B. Owens

USDA–Agricultural Research Service, North Appalachian Experimental Watershed, P.O. Box 488, Coshocton, OH 43812-0488

* Corresponding author (martin{at}coshocton.ars.usda.gov)

Received for publication December 22, 2005. Conservation tillage can reduce soil loss; however, the residual herbicides normally used to control weeds are often detected in surface runoff at high levels, particularly if runoff-producing storms occur shortly after application. Therefore, we measured losses of alachlor, atrazine, linuron, and metribuzin from seven small (0.45–0.79-ha) watersheds for 9 yr (1993–2001) to investigate whether a reduced-input system for corn (Zea mays L.) and soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] production with light disking, cultivation, and half-rate herbicide applications could reduce losses compared with chisel and no-till. As a percentage of application, annual losses were highest for all herbicides for no-till and similar for chisel and reduced-input. Atrazine was the most frequently detected herbicide and yearly flow-weighted concentrations exceeded the drinking water standard of 3 µg L–1 in 20 out of 27 watershed years that it was applied. Averaged for 9 corn yr, yearly flow-weighted atrazine concentrations were 26.3, 9.6, and 8.3 µg L–1 for no-till, chisel, and reduced-input, respectively. Similarly, flow-weighted concentrations of alachlor exceeded the drinking water standard of 2 µg L–1 in 23 out of 54 application years and in all treatments. Thus, while banding and half-rate applications as part of a reduced-input management practice reduced herbicide loss, concentrations of some herbicides may still be a concern. For all watersheds, 60 to 99% of herbicide loss was due to the five largest transport events during the 9-yr period. Thus, regardless of tillage practice, a small number of runoff events, usually shortly after herbicide application, dominated herbicide transport.

Abbreviations: DAA, days after application • HAL, health advisory level • MCL, maximum contaminant level • NAEW, North Appalachian Experimental Watershed




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Environ. Qual.Home page
M. J. Shipitalo, R. W. Malone, and L. B. Owens
Impact of Glyphosate-Tolerant Soybean and Glufosinate-Tolerant Corn Production on Herbicide Losses in Surface Runoff
J. Environ. Qual., March 1, 2008; 37(2): 401 - 408.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Copyright © 2006 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.