HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Schilling, K. E. Articles by Spooner, J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Schilling, K. E. Articles by Spooner, J. Agricola Articles by Schilling, K. E. Articles by Spooner, J. Related Collections Surface Water Quality Watershed and Landscape Processes Cover Crops

TECHNICAL REPORTS

Landscape and Watershed Processes

Effects of Watershed-Scale Land Use Change on Stream Nitrate Concentrations

^a Iowa Department of Natural Resources, Iowa Geological Survey, 109 Trowbridge Hall, Iowa City, IA 52242-1319
^b Soil & Water Environmental Technology Center (SWETC), North Carolina State University, Box 7637, Raleigh, NC 27695-7637

^* Corresponding author (kschilling{at}igsb.uiowa.edu)

Received for publication April 20, 2006. The Walnut Creek Watershed Monitoring Project was conducted from 1995 through 2005 to evaluate the response of stream nitrate concentrations to changing land use patterns in paired 5000-ha Iowa watersheds. A large portion of the Walnut Creek watershed is being converted from row crop agriculture to native prairie and savanna by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service at the Neal Smith National Wildlife Refuge (NSNWR). Before restoration, land use in both Walnut Creek (treatment) and Squaw Creek (control) watersheds consisted of 70% row crops. Between 1990 and 2005, row crop area decreased 25.4% in Walnut Creek due to prairie restoration but increased 9.2% in Squaw Creek due to Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) grassland conversion back to row crop. Nitrate concentrations ranged between <0.5 to 14 mg L^–1 at the Walnut Creek outlet and 2.1 to 15 mg L^–1 at the downstream Squaw Creek outlet. Nitrate concentrations decreased 1.2 mg L^–1 over 10 yr in the Walnut Creek watershed but increased 1.9 mg L^–1 over 10 yr in Squaw Creek. Changes in nitrate were easier to detect and more pronounced in monitored subbasins, decreasing 1.2 to 3.4 mg L^–1 in three Walnut Creek subbasins, but increasing up to 8.0 and 11.6 mg L^–1 in 10 yr in two Squaw Creek subbasins. Converting row crop lands to grass reduced stream nitrate levels over time in Walnut Creek, but stream nitrate rapidly increased in Squaw Creek when CRP grasslands were converted back to row crop. Study results highlight the close association of stream nitrate to land use change and emphasize that grasslands or other perennial vegetation placed in agricultural settings should be part of a long-term solution to water quality problems.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. Kang, H. Lin, W. J. Gburek, G. J. Folmar, and B. Lowery Baseflow Nitrate in Relation to Stream Order and Agricultural Land Use J. Environ. Qual., May 1, 2008; 37(3): 808 - 816. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]