HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Schoonover, J. E. Articles by Helms, B. S. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Schoonover, J. E. Articles by Helms, B. S. Agricola Articles by Schoonover, J. E. Articles by Helms, B. S. Related Collections Watershed and Landscape Processes Surface Water Quality

TECHNICAL REPORTS

Landscape and Watershed Processes

Impacts of Land Cover on Stream Hydrology in the West Georgia Piedmont, USA

^a Southern Illinois University Carbondale, Department of Forestry, 1205 Lincoln Drive, Carbondale, IL 62901-4411
^b Auburn University, School of Forestry and Wildlife Sciences, Auburn, AL 36849
^c Auburn University, Biological Sciences, Auburn, AL 36849

^* Corresponding author (jschoon{at}siu.edu)

Received for publication March 20, 2006. The southeastern United States is experiencing rapid urban development. Consequently, Georgia's streams are experiencing hydrologic alterations from extensive development and from other land use activities such as livestock grazing and silviculture. A study was performed to assess stream hydrology within 18 watersheds ranging from 500 to 2500 ha. Study streams were first, second, or third order and hydrology was continuously monitored from 29 July 2003 to 23 September 2004 using InSitu pressure transducers. Rating curves between stream stage (i.e., water depth) and discharge were developed for each stream by correlating biweekly discharge measurements and stage data. Dependent variables were calculated from discharge data and placed into 4 categories: flow frequency (i.e., the number of times a predetermined discharge threshold is exceeded), flow magnitude (i.e., maximum and minimum flows), flow duration (i.e., the amount of time discharge was above or below a predetermined threshold), and flow predictability and flashiness. Fine resolution data (i.e., 15-min interval) were also compared to daily discharge data to determine if resolution affected how streams were classified hydrologically. Urban watersheds experienced flashy discharges during storm events, whereas pastoral and forested watersheds showed less flashy hydrographs. Also, in comparison to all other flow variables, flow frequency measures were most strongly correlated to land cover. Furthermore, the stream hydrology was explained similarly with both the 15-min and daily data resolutions.

Abbreviations: IS, impervious surface • BI, baseflow index • RC, runoff coefficient • NCDC, National Climatic Data Center • CV, coefficient of variation

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. Bartens, S. D. Day, J. R. Harris, J. E. Dove, and T. M. Wynn Can Urban Tree Roots Improve Infiltration through Compacted Subsoils for Stormwater Management? J. Environ. Qual., October 23, 2008; 37(6): 2048 - 2057. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]