HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (2) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Muenz, T. K. Articles by Smith, L. L. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Muenz, T. K. Articles by Smith, L. L. Agricola Articles by Muenz, T. K. Articles by Smith, L. L. Related Collections Water Quality Surface Water Quality

TECHNICAL REPORTS

Surface Water Quality

Stream Buffer Effectiveness in an Agriculturally Influenced Area, Southwestern Georgia

Responses of Water Quality, Macroinvertebrates, and Amphibians

^a J.W. Jones Ecological Research Center, Route 2 Box 2324, Newton, GA 39870
^b Institute of Ecology, Univ. of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602
^c Dep. of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, Univ. of Georgia, Tifton, GA 31793-0748

^* Corresponding author (tmuenz{at}jonesctr.org)

Received for publication December 13, 2005. To determine useful metrics for assessing stream water quality in the Southeastern Coastal Plain, we examined differences among two buffered and three unbuffered streams in an agricultural landscape in southwestern Georgia. Potential indicators included amphibian diversity and abundance, aquatic macroinvertebrate populations, riparian vegetative structure, water quality, and stream physical parameters. Variability among sites and treatments (buffered vs. unbuffered) existed, with sites in the same treatment as most similar, and disturbances from a nearby eroding gully strongly affecting one unbuffered site. Of the invertebrate metrics examined, percentages of clingers, Ephemeroptera-Plecoptera-Trichoptera (EPT), Elmidae (Coleoptera), Crustacea (Decapoda and Amphipoda), and dipterans were found to be possible indicators of stream health for perennial streams within this region. Overall, buffered sites showed higher percentages of sensitive invertebrate groups and showed lower and more stable concentrations of nitrate N, suspended solids, and fecal coliforms (FCs). Percent canopy cover was similar among sites; however, riparian vegetative coverage and percent leaf litter were greatest at buffered sites. No differences in amphibian abundance, presence, and absence within the riparian area were apparent between sites; however, instream larval salamanders were more abundant at buffered streams. In this study, stream buffers appeared to decrease nutrient and sediment loads to adjacent streams, enhancing overall water quality. Selected benthic macroinvertebrate metrics and amphibian abundance also appeared sensitive to agricultural influences. Amphibians show potential as indicator candidates, however further information is needed on their responses and tolerances to disturbances from the microhabitat to landscape levels.

Abbreviations: EPT, Ephemeroptera-Plecoptera-Trichoptera • PCA, principal components analysis • FC, fecal coliform • FS, fecal streptococci • IBI, index of biotic integrity • AFDM, ash free dry mass • DBH, diameter at breast height

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D.R. Smith, S.J. Livingston, B.W. Zuercher, M. Larose, G.C. Heathman, and C. Huang Nutrient losses from row crop agriculture in Indiana Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, November 1, 2008; 63(6): 396 - 409. [Abstract] [PDF]