JEQ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 9 August 2006
Published in J Environ Qual 35:1633-1658 (2006)
DOI: 10.2134/jeq2005.0378
© 2006 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (22)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cerdeira, A. L.
Right arrow Articles by Duke, S. O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cerdeira, A. L.
Right arrow Articles by Duke, S. O.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Cerdeira, A. L.
Right arrow Articles by Duke, S. O.
Related Collections
Right arrow Weed Management
Right arrow Ecological Risk Assessment
Right arrow Agricultural Pesticides
Right arrow Plant and Environment Interactions
Right arrow Water Pollution

REVIEWS AND ANALYSES

The Current Status and Environmental Impacts of Glyphosate-Resistant Crops

A Review

Antonio L. Cerdeiraa and Stephen O. Dukeb,*

a Brazilian Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Embrapa/Environment, C.P. 69, Jaguariuna-SP-13820-000, Brazil
b USDA-ARS, Natural Products Utilization Research Unit, P.O. Box 8048, University, MS 38677, USA

* Corresponding author (sduke{at}olemiss.edu)

Received for publication October 3, 2005. Glyphosate [N-(phosphonomethyl) glycine]-resistant crops (GRCs), canola (Brassica napus L.), cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.), maize (Zea mays L.), and soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] have been commercialized and grown extensively in the Western Hemisphere and, to a lesser extent, elsewhere. Glyphosate-resistant cotton and soybean have become dominant in those countries where their planting is permitted. Effects of glyphosate on contamination of soil, water, and air are minimal, compared to some of the herbicides that they replace. No risks have been found with food or feed safety or nutritional value in products from currently available GRCs. Glyphosate-resistant crops have promoted the adoption of reduced- or no-tillage agriculture in the USA and Argentina, providing a substantial environmental benefit. Weed species in GRC fields have shifted to those that can more successfully withstand glyphosate and to those that avoid the time of its application. Three weed species have evolved resistance to glyphosate in GRCs. Glyphosate-resistant crops have greater potential to become problems as volunteer crops than do conventional crops. Glyphosate resistance transgenes have been found in fields of canola that are supposed to be non-transgenic. Under some circumstances, the largest risk of GRCs may be transgene flow (introgression) from GRCs to related species that might become problems in natural ecosystems. Glyphosate resistance transgenes themselves are highly unlikely to be a risk in wild plant populations, but when linked to transgenes that may impart fitness benefits outside of agriculture (e.g., insect resistance), natural ecosystems could be affected. The development and use of failsafe introgression barriers in crops with such linked genes is needed.

Abbreviations: AMPA, aminomethylphosphonate • EPSPS, 5-enolpyruvyl-shikimate-3-phosphate synthase • GR, glyphosate-resistant • GRC, glyphosate-resistant crop • HRC, herbicide-resistant crop




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Environ. Qual.Home page
M. J. Shipitalo, R. W. Malone, and L. B. Owens
Impact of Glyphosate-Tolerant Soybean and Glufosinate-Tolerant Corn Production on Herbicide Losses in Surface Runoff
J. Environ. Qual., March 1, 2008; 37(2): 401 - 408.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
D. K. Combs and G. F. Hartnell
Alfalfa Containing the Glyphosate-Tolerant Trait Has No Effect on Feed Intake, Milk Composition, or Milk Production of Dairy Cattle
J Dairy Sci, February 1, 2008; 91(2): 673 - 678.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
M. R. Behrens, N. Mutlu, S. Chakraborty, R. Dumitru, W. Z. Jiang, B. J. LaVallee, P. L. Herman, T. E. Clemente, and D. P. Weeks
Dicamba Resistance: Enlarging and Preserving Biotechnology-Based Weed Management Strategies
Science, May 25, 2007; 316(5828): 1185 - 1188.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal Journal of Plant Registrations The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2006 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.