|
|
||||||||
a USDA-ARS-NPARL, 1500 North Central Avenue, Sidney, MT 59270
b Agricultural Research Station, Fort Valley State University, Fort Valley, GA 31030
* Corresponding author (usainju{at}sidney.ars.usda.gov)
Received for publication May 12, 2005. Soil carbon (C) sequestration in tilled and nontilled areas can be influenced by crop management practices due to differences in plant C inputs and their rate of mineralization. We examined the influence of four cover crops {legume [hairy vetch (Vicia villosa Roth)], nonlegume [rye (Secale cereale L.)], biculture of legume and nonlegume (vetch and rye), and no cover crops (or winter weeds)} and three nitrogen (N) fertilization rates (0, 60 to 65, and 120 to 130 kg N ha1) on C inputs from cover crops, cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.), and sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench)], and soil organic carbon (SOC) at the 0- to 120-cm depth in tilled and nontilled areas. A field experiment was conducted on Dothan sandy loam (fine-loamy, siliceous, thermic Plinthic Paleudults) from 1999 to 2002 in central Georgia. Total C inputs to the soil from cover crops, cotton, and sorghum from 2000 to 2002 ranged from 6.8 to 22.8 Mg ha1. The SOC at 0 to 10 cm fluctuated with C input from October 1999 to November 2002 and was greater from cover crops than from weeds in no-tilled plots. In contrast, SOC values at 10 to 30 cm in no-tilled and at 0 to 60 cm in chisel-tilled plots were greater for biculture than for weeds. As a result, C at 0 to 30 cm was sequestered at rates of 267, 33, 133, and 967 kg C ha1 yr1 for biculture, rye, vetch, and weeds, respectively, in the no-tilled plot. In strip-tilled and chisel-tilled plots, SOC at 0 to 30 cm decreased at rates of 233 to 1233 kg C ha1 yr1. The SOC at 0 to 30 cm increased more in cover crops with 120 to 130 kg N ha1 yr1 than in weeds with 0 kg N ha1 yr1, regardless of tillage. In the subtropical humid region of the southeastern United States, cover crops and N fertilization can increase the amount of C input and storage in tilled and nontilled soils, and hairy vetch and rye biculture was more effective in sequestering C than monocultures or no cover crop.
Abbreviations: SOC, soil organic carbon
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. M. Novak, J. R. Frederick, P. J. Bauer, and D. W. Watts Rebuilding Organic Carbon Contents in Coastal Plain Soils Using Conservation Tillage Systems Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., March 1, 2009; 73(2): 622 - 629. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. B. Triplett Jr. and W. A. Dick No-Tillage Crop Production: A Revolution in Agriculture! Agron. J., May 7, 2008; 100(Supplement_3): S-153 - S-165. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C.J. Dell, P.R. Salon, C.D. Franks, E.C. Benham, and Y. Plowden No-till and cover crop impacts on soil carbon and associated properties on Pennsylvania dairy farms Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, May 1, 2008; 63(3): 136 - 142. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
U. M. Sainju, Z. N. Senwo, E. Z. Nyakatawa, I. A. Tazisong, and K. C. Reddy Tillage, Cropping Systems, and Nitrogen Fertilizer Source Effects on Soil Carbon Sequestration and Fractions J. Environ. Qual., May 1, 2008; 37(3): 880 - 888. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. A. Khan, R. L. Mulvaney, T. R. Ellsworth, and C. W. Boast The Myth of Nitrogen Fertilization for Soil Carbon Sequestration J. Environ. Qual., October 24, 2007; 36(6): 1821 - 1832. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| The SCI Journals | Agronomy Journal | Crop Science | |||
| Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education |
Vadose Zone Journal | ||||
| Soil Science Society of America Journal | Journal of Plant Registrations | The Plant Genome | |||