HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Causarano, H. J. Articles by Shaw, J. N. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Causarano, H. J. Articles by Shaw, J. N. Agricola Articles by Causarano, H. J. Articles by Shaw, J. N. Related Collections Cotton Carbon Sequestration Cover Crops Soil Conservation Tillage

Soil Organic Carbon Sequestration in Cotton Production Systems of the Southeastern United States

A Review

^a Department of Agronomy and Soils, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849
^b USDA-ARS, 1420 Experiment Station Road, Watkinsville, GA 30677

^* Corresponding author (afranz{at}uga.edu)

Received for publication April 26, 2005. Past agricultural management practices have contributed to the loss of soil organic carbon (SOC) and emission of greenhouse gases (e.g., carbon dioxide and nitrous oxide). Fortunately, however, conservation-oriented agricultural management systems can be, and have been, developed to sequester SOC, improve soil quality, and increase crop productivity. Our objectives were to (i) review literature related to SOC sequestration in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) production systems, (ii) recommend best management practices to sequester SOC, and (iii) outline the current political scenario and future probabilities for cotton producers to benefit from SOC sequestration. From a review of 20 studies in the region, SOC increased with no tillage compared with conventional tillage by 0.48 ± 0.56 Mg C ha^–1 yr^–1 (H₀: no change, p < 0.001). More diverse rotations of cotton with high-residue-producing crops such as corn (Zea mays L.) and small grains would sequester greater quantities of SOC than continuous cotton. No-tillage cropping with a cover crop sequestered 0.67 ± 0.63 Mg C ha^–1 yr^–1, while that of no-tillage cropping without a cover crop sequestered 0.34 ± 47 Mg C ha^–1 yr^–1 (mean comparison, p = 0.04). Current government incentive programs recommend agricultural practices that would contribute to SOC sequestration. Participation in the Conservation Security Program could lead to government payments of up to $20 ha^–1. Current open-market trading of C credits would appear to yield less than $3 ha^–1, although prices would greatly increase should a government policy to limit greenhouse gas emissions be mandated.

Abbreviations: GHG, greenhouse gas • SOC, soil organic carbon

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. M. Novak, J. R. Frederick, P. J. Bauer, and D. W. Watts Rebuilding Organic Carbon Contents in Coastal Plain Soils Using Conservation Tillage Systems Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., March 1, 2009; 73(2): 622 - 629. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. S. Reiter, D. W. Reeves, C. H. Burmester, and H. A. Torbert Cotton Nitrogen Management in a High-Residue Conservation System: Cover Crop Fertilization Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., September 1, 2008; 72(5): 1321 - 1329. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]