HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by He, Z. Articles by Bertsch, P. M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by He, Z. Articles by Bertsch, P. M. Agricola Articles by He, Z. Articles by Bertsch, P. M. Related Collections Phosphorus Biogeochemical Processes Soil Analysis Soil Chemistry Other Waste Management

TECHNICAL REPORTS

Waste Management

Preparation and FT–IR Characterization of Metal Phytate Compounds

^a USDA–ARS, New England Plant, Soil, and Water Laboratory, Orono, ME 04469
^b Agriculture & Agri-Food Canada, Greenhouse & Processing Crop Center, Harrow, ON, N0R 1G0, Canada
^c Savannah River Ecology Laboratory, University of Georgia, P.O. Drawer E, Aiken, SC 29802

^* Corresponding author (Zhongqi.he{at}ars.usda.gov)

Received for publication January 5, 2006. Phytic acid (inositol hexaphosphoric acid, IP6) has long been recognized as the predominant organic P form in soil and animal manure. Whereas many studies have investigated the wet chemistry of IP6, there is little information on the characterization of solid metal IP6 compounds. This information is essential for further understanding and assessing the chemical behavior of IP6 in diverse soil–plant–water ecosystems. As the first step in full characterization, we synthesized eight metal phytate compounds and investigated their structural features using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT–IR). The absorption features from 900 to 1200 cm^–1 in FT–IR could be used to identify these phytates as: (i) light divalent metal (Ca and Mg) compounds with a sharp band and a broad band, (ii) heavy divalent metal (Cu and Mn) compounds with splitting broad bands, and (iii) trivalent metal (Al and Fe) compounds with a broad band and a shoulder band. Three different types of chemical structures of metal–phytate compounds were presented based on the FT–IR information. We further demonstrated that metal orthophosphates possessed different FT–IR spectral characteristics from their IP6 counterparts. The unique spectral features of metal phytates from 1000 to 700 cm^–1 could be used to distinguish phytate compounds from metal phosphate compounds. Thus, FT–IR analysis after fine tuning could provide an analytical tool to investigate the basic metal phytate chemistry in molecular levels, such as the competitive interactions between phosphate and phytate with a specific metal ion, and the conversion (or hydrolysis) of metal phytate to metal phosphate under various conditions.

Abbreviations: FeOOH, goethite • FT–IR, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy • IP6, inositol hexaphosphoric acid • NMR, nuclear magnetic resonance • XANES, X-ray absorption near edge structure

This article has been cited by other articles:

				Z. He, C. W. Honeycutt, T. Zhang, P. J. Pellechia, and W. A. Caliebe Distinction of Metal Species of Phytate by Solid-State Spectroscopic Techniques Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., May 16, 2007; 71(3): 940 - 943. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]