HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Acosta-Martínez, V. Articles by Harmel, R. D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Acosta-Martínez, V. Articles by Harmel, R. D. Agricola Articles by Acosta-Martínez, V. Articles by Harmel, R. D. Related Collections Soil Microbiology Microbial Processes Soil Biochemistry

TECHNICAL REPORTS

Waste Management

Soil Microbial Communities and Enzyme Activities under Various Poultry Litter Application Rates

^a USDA-ARS, Cropping Systems Research Laboratory, 3810 4th Street, Lubbock, TX 79415
^b USDA-ARS, Grassland, Soil and Water Research Laboratory, 808 East Blackland Road, Temple, TX 76502

^* Corresponding author (vacostam{at}lbk.ars.usda.gov)

Received for publication December 20, 2005. The potential excessive nutrient and/or microbial loading from mismanaged land application of organic fertilizers is forcing changes in animal waste management. Currently, it is not clear to what extent different rates of poultry litter impact soil microbial communities, which control nutrient availability, organic matter quality and quantity, and soil degradation potential. From 2002 to 2004, we investigated the microbial community and several enzyme activities in a Vertisol soil (fine, smectitic, thermic, Udic Haplustert) at 0 to 15 cm as affected by different rates of poultry litter application to pasture (0, 6.7, and 13.4 Mg ha^–1) and cultivated sites (0, 4.5, 6.7, 9.0, 11.2, and 13.4 Mg ha^–1) in Texas, USA. No differences in soil pH (average: 7.9), total N (pasture: 2.01–3.53, cultivated: 1.09–1.98 g kg^–1 soil) or organic C (pasture average: 25–26.7, cultivated average: 13.9–16.1 g kg^–1 soil) were observed following the first four years of litter application. Microbial biomass carbon (MBC) and nitrogen (MBN) increased at litter rates greater than 6.7 Mg ha^–1 (pasture: MBC = >863, MBN = >88 mg kg^–1 soil) compared to sites with no applied litter (MBC = 722, MBN = 69 mg kg^–1 soil). Enzyme activities of C (ß-glucosidase, -galactosidase, ß-glucosaminidase) or N cycling (ß-glucosaminidase) were increased at litter rates greater than 6.7 Mg ha^–1. Enzyme activities of P (alkaline phosphatase) and S (arylsulfatase) mineralization showed the same response in pasture, but they were only increased at the highest (9.0, 11.2, and 13.4 Mg ha^–1) litter application rates in cultivated sites. According to fatty acid methyl ester (FAME) analysis, the pasture soils experienced shifts to higher bacterial populations at litter rates of 6.7 Mg ha^–1, and shifts to higher fungal populations at the highest litter application rates in cultivated sites. While rates greater than 6.7 Mg ha^–1 provided rapid enhancement of the soil microbial populations and enzymatic activities, they result in P application in excess of crop needs. Thus, studies will continue to investigate whether litter application at rates below 6.7 Mg ha^–1, previously recommended to maintain water quality, will result in similar improved soil microbial and biochemical functioning with continued annual litter application.

Abbreviations: FAME, fatty acid methyl ester • MBC, microbial biomass carbon • MBN, microbial biomass nitrogen • PCA, principal component analysis