HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Kleinman, P. J. A. Articles by Bryant, R. B. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Kleinman, P. J. A. Articles by Bryant, R. B. Agricola Articles by Kleinman, P. J. A. Articles by Bryant, R. B. Related Collections Nutrients Hillslope Analysis Nutrient Management Phosphorus

TECHNICAL REPORTS

Landscape and Watershed Processes

Role of Rainfall Intensity and Hydrology in Nutrient Transport via Surface Runoff

USDA–ARS, Pasture Systems and Watershed Management Research Unit, 3702 Curtin Road, University Park, PA 16802

^* Corresponding author (Peter.Kleinman{at}ars.usda.gov)

Received for publication January 9, 2006. Loss of soil nutrients in runoff accelerates eutrophication of surface waters. This study evaluated P and N in surface runoff in relation to rainfall intensity and hydrology for two soils along a single hillslope. Experiments were initiated on 1- by 2-m plots at foot-slope (6%) and mid-slope (30%) positions within an alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.)–orchardgrass (Dactylis glomerata L.) field. Rain simulations (2.9 and 7.0 cm h^–1) were conducted under wet (spring) and dry (late-summer) conditions. Elevated, antecedent soil moisture at the foot-slope during the spring resulted in less rain required to generate runoff and greater runoff volumes, compared with runoff from the well-drained mid-slope in spring and at both landscape positions in late summer. Phosphorus in runoff was primarily in dissolved reactive form (DRP averaged 71% of total P), with DRP concentrations from the two soils corresponding with soil test P levels. Nitrogen in runoff was mainly nitrate (NO₃–N averaged 77% of total N). Site hydrology, not chemistry, was primarily responsible for variations in mass N and P losses with landscape position. Larger runoff volumes from the foot-slope produced higher losses of total P (0.08 kg ha^–1) and N (1.35 kg ha^–1) than did runoff from the mid-slope (0.05 total P kg ha^–1; 0.48 kg N ha^–1), particularly under wet, spring-time conditions. Nutrient losses were significantly greater under the high intensity rainfall due to larger runoff volumes. Results affirm the critical source area concept for both N and P: both nutrient availability and hydrology in combination control nutrient loss.

Abbreviations: DRP, dissolved reactive phosphorus • EDI, effective depth of interaction • NH₄–N, ammonium-nitrogen • NO₃–N, nitrate-nitrogen • PP, particulate phosphorus • SS, suspended solids • TKN, total Kjeldahl nitrogen • TP, total phosphorus • WEP, water extractable phosphorus

This article has been cited by other articles:

				Yihe Lu, Bojie Fu, Liding Chen, Guohua Liu, and Wei Wei Nutrient transport associated with water erosion: progress and prospect Progress in Physical Geography, December 1, 2007; 31(6): 607 - 620. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. S. Srinivasan, P. J. A. Kleinman, A. N. Sharpley, T. Buob, and W. J. Gburek Hydrology of Small Field Plots Used to Study Phosphorus Runoff under Simulated Rainfall J. Environ. Qual., October 24, 2007; 36(6): 1833 - 1842. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]