JEQ Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 26 April 2006
Published in J Environ Qual 35:928-937 (2006)
DOI: 10.2134/jeq2005.0409
© 2006 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zvomuya, F.
Right arrow Articles by Olson, B. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zvomuya, F.
Right arrow Articles by Olson, B. M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Zvomuya, F.
Right arrow Articles by Olson, B. M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Soil Fertility and Productivity
Right arrow Animal Waste
Right arrow Nutrient Management
Right arrow Phosphorus
Right arrow Soil Chemistry

TECHNICAL REPORTS

Waste Management

Predicting Phosphorus Availability from Soil-Applied Composted and Non-Composted Cattle Feedlot Manure

Francis Zvomuyaa, Bobbi L. Helgasonb, Francis J. Larneya,*, H. Henry Janzena, Olalekan O. Akinremic and Barry M. Olsond

a Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Lethbridge Research Centre, 5403 1st Avenue South, Lethbridge, AB, Canada T1J 4B1
b Land Resource Unit, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, 51 Campus Drive, Saskatoon, SK, Canada S7N 5A8
c Department of Soil Science, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada R3T 2N2
d Alberta Agriculture, Food and Rural Development, 5401 1st Avenue South, Lethbridge, AB, Canada T1J 4V6

* Corresponding author (larney{at}agr.gc.ca)

Received for publication October 26, 2005. Prediction of phosphorus (P) availability from soil-applied composts and manure is important for agronomic and environmental reasons. This study utilized chemical properties of eight composted and two non-composted beef cattle (Bos taurus) manures to predict cumulative phosphorus uptake (CPU) during a 363-d controlled environment chamber bioassay. Ten growth cycles of canola (Brassica napus L.) were raised in pots containing 2 kg of a Dark Brown Chernozemic clay loam soil (fine-loamy, mixed, Typic Haploboroll) mixed with 0.04 kg of the amendments. Inorganic P fertilizer (KH2PO4) and an unamended control were included for comparison. All treatments received a nutrient solution containing an adequate supply of all essential nutrients, except P, which was supplied by the amendments. Cumulative P uptake was similar for composted (74 mg kg–1 soil) and non-composted manures (60 mg kg–1 soil) and for the latter and the fertilizer (40 mg kg–1 soil). However, the CPU was significantly higher for organic amendments than the control (24 mg kg–1 soil) and for composted manure than the fertilizer. Apparent phosphorus recovery (APR) from composted manure (24%) was significantly lower than that from non-composted manure (33%), but there was no significant difference in APR between the organic amendments and the fertilizer (27%). Partial least squares (PLS) regression indicated that only two parameters [total water-extractable phosphorus (TPH2O) and total phosphorus (TP) concentration of amendments] were adequate to model amendment-derived cumulative phosphorus uptake (ACPU), explaining 81% of the variation in ACPU. These results suggest that P availability from soil-applied composted and non-composted manures can be adequately predicted from a few simple amendment chemical measurements. Accurate prediction of P availability and plant P recovery may help tailor manure and compost applications to plant needs and minimize the buildup of bioavailable P, which can contribute to eutrophication of sensitive aquatic systems.

Abbreviations: ACPU, amendment-derived cumulative phosphorus uptake • APR, apparent phosphorus recovery • CPU, cumulative phosphorus uptake • MKP, modified Kelowna-extractable phosphorus • OLS, ordinary least squares • OM, organic matter • Pi, inorganic phosphorus • PiH2O, total water-extractable inorganic phosphorus • PiHCl, total HCl-extractable inorganic phosphorus • PiHCO3, total NaHCO3–extractable inorganic phosphorus • PiNaOH, total NaOH-extractable inorganic phosphorus • PLS, partial least squares • Po, organic phosphorus • PoH2O, total water-extractable organic phosphorus • PoHCl, total HCl-extractable organic phosphorus • PoHCO3, total NaHCO3–extractable organic phosphorus • PoNaOH, total NaOH-extractable organic phosphorus • Pres, residual phosphorus • PRESS, predicted residual sum of squares • SBM, straw-bedded manure • TC, total carbon • TP, total phosphorus • TPH2O, total water-extractable phosphorus • TPHCl, total HCl-extractable phosphorus • TPHCO3, total NaHCO3–extractable phosphorus • TPi, total inorganic phosphorus • TPNaOH, total NaOH-extractable phosphorus • TPo, total organic phosphorus • VIP, variable importance on prediction • WBM, wood chip–bedded manure







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Copyright © 2006 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.