HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Web of Science (2) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Ginting, D. Articles by Mamo, M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Ginting, D. Articles by Mamo, M. Agricola Articles by Ginting, D. Articles by Mamo, M. Related Collections Water Quality Soil Methods/Instrumentation Runoff Water Pollution

TECHNICAL REPORTS

Surface Water Quality

Measuring Runoff-Suspended Solids Using an Improved Turbidometer Method

Department of Agronomy and Horticulture, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68583

^* Corresponding author (mmamo3{at}unl.edu)

Received for publication June 1, 2005. Differences in particle size distribution between runoff standards and unknown samples affect the accuracy of estimation of total suspended solids (TSS) concentration using the nephelometric turbidity (NTU) method. The objective was to quantify the effects of a sucrose solution as suspending medium and contrasting particle size distribution on nephelometric turbidity and accuracy of TSS estimation. Nineteen benchmark soils varying in texture and color were divided into particle size distribution of <250 and <2000 µm. Soils from these two aggregate classes were then made into suspension ranging from 0.2 to 15 g L^–1 using distilled deionized water. Runoff suspensions ranging from 0.2 to 21 g L^–1 were also collected from different watersheds. Turbidity of soil and runoff suspensions was measured in sucrose solution and in distilled deionized water. The sucrose solution density ranged from 1.10 to 1.30 kg L^–1. Increasing sucrose solution density decreased turbidity. The TSS concentration was most sensitive to changes in turbidity with the 1.30 kg L^–1 sucrose solution. Using the 1.30 kg L^–1 sucrose solution, particle size bias and error of TSS estimates were decreased by at least 20% compared to distilled deionized water. Reduction in refraction index differences between the suspended particles and sucrose solution combined with reduced particle settling and reduced Brownian motion resulted in dampening the effects of particle size distribution. We propose a sucrose solution of 1.30 kg L^–1 as a better suspending medium to dampen the effect of particle size distribution and thus improve suspension TSS concentration estimation.

Abbreviations: CRM, coefficient of residual mass • D_gm, geometric mean diameter • ME, model efficiency • NTU, nephelometric turbidity unit • RI, refractive index • RMSE, root mean square error • RTD, relative turbidity difference • SSC, suspended sediment concentration • TDS, total dissolved solids • TSS, total suspended solids