JEQ Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 1 March 2006
Published in J Environ Qual 35:548-557 (2006)
DOI: 10.2134/jeq2005.0230
© 2006 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sparling, G. P.
Right arrow Articles by Schipper, L. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sparling, G. P.
Right arrow Articles by Schipper, L. A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Sparling, G. P.
Right arrow Articles by Schipper, L. A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Ecological Risk Assessment
Right arrow Economics
Right arrow Soil Organic Matter

TECHNICAL REPORTS

Ecological Risk Assessment

What is Soil Organic Matter Worth?

G. P. Sparlinga,*, D. Wheelerb, E.-T. Veselyc and L. A. Schippera

a Landcare Research, Private Bag 3127, Hamilton, New Zealand
b AgResearch, Ruakura Research Centre, Private Bag 3123, Hamilton, New Zealand
c Landcare Research, Private Bag 92170, Auckland, New Zealand

* Corresponding author (sparlingg{at}landcareresearch.co.nz)

Currency rate: The average bank exchange rate 2000–2004 for the New Zealand dollar was Euro 0.501 (high 0.557, low 0.438), United States dollar 0.518 (high 0.727, low 0.389), and Australian dollar 0.850 (high 0.948, low 0.742). Source: OANDA FX History 2005 (http://www.oanda.com/convert/fxhistory; verified 13 Dec. 2005).

Received for publication June 8, 2005. The conservation and restoration of soil organic matter are often advocated because of the generally beneficial effects on soil attributes for plant growth and crop production. More recently, organic matter has become important as a terrestrial sink and store for C and N. We have attempted to derive a monetary value of soil organic matter for crop production and storage functions in three contrasting New Zealand soil orders (Gley, Melanic, and Granular Soils). Soil chemical and physical characteristics of real-life examples of three pairs of matched soils with low organic matter contents (after long-term continuous cropping for vegetables or maize) or high organic matter content (continuous pasture) were used as input data for a pasture (grass–clover) production model. The differences in pasture dry matter yields (non-irrigated) were calculated for three climate scenarios (wet, dry, and average years) and the yields converted to an equivalent weight and financial value of milk solids. We also estimated the hypothetical value of the C and N sequestered during the recovery phase of the low organic matter content soils assuming trading with C and N credits. For all three soil orders, and for the three climate scenarios, pasture dry matter yields were decreased in the soils with lower organic matter contents. The extra organic matter in the high C soils was estimated to be worth NZ$27 to NZ$150 ha–1 yr–1 in terms of increased milk solids production. The decreased yields from the previously cropped soils were predicted to persist for 36 to 125 yr, but with declining effect as organic matter gradually recovered, giving an accumulated loss in pastoral production worth around NZ$518 to NZ$1239 ha–1. This was 42 to 73 times lower than the hypothetical value of the organic matter as a sequestering agent for C and N, which varied between NZ$22 963 to NZ$90 849 depending on the soil, region, discount rates, and values used for carbon and nitrogen credits.

Abbreviations: AEC, anion exchange capacity • DBD, dry bulk density • QT, QuickTest




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Environ. Qual.Home page
M. Deurer, S. Sivakumaran, S. Ralle, I. Vogeler, I. McIvor, B. Clothier, S. Green, and J. Bachmann
A New Method to Quantify the Impact of Soil Carbon Management on Biophysical Soil Properties: The Example of Two Apple Orchard Systems in New Zealand
J. Environ. Qual., May 1, 2008; 37(3): 915 - 924.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
F. Chen, D. E. Kissel, L. T. West, W. Adkins, D. Rickman, and J. C. Luvall
Mapping Soil Organic Carbon Concentration for Multiple Fields with Image Similarity Analysis
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., January 11, 2008; 72(1): 186 - 193.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
W. W. Wilhelm, J. M. F. Johnson, D. L. Karlen, and D. T. Lightle
Corn Stover to Sustain Soil Organic Carbon Further Constrains Biomass Supply
Agron. J., November 6, 2007; 99(6): 1665 - 1667.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
R. T. Venterea, J. M. Baker, M. S. Dolan, and K. A. Spokas
Carbon and Nitrogen Storage are Greater under Biennial Tillage in a Minnesota Corn-Soybean Rotation
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., August 22, 2006; 70(5): 1752 - 1762.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Copyright © 2006 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.