HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (3) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Silveira, M. L. Articles by O'Connor, G. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Silveira, M. L. Articles by O'Connor, G. A. Agricola Articles by Silveira, M. L. Articles by O'Connor, G. A. Related Collections Phosphorus Nutrient Management Other Waste Management

TECHNICAL REPORTS

Waste Management

Phosphorus Release from a Manure-Impacted Spodosol: Effects of a Water Treatment Residual

Soil and Water Science Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611-0510

^* Corresponding author (mlsilveira{at}ifas.ufl.edu)

Received for publication April 27, 2005. Long-term depositions of animal manures affect P dynamics in soils and can pose environmental risks associated with P losses. Laboratory studies were done on P solubility characteristics in a manure-impacted Immokalee soil (sandy, siliceous, hyperthermic Arenic Alaquod) and the effectiveness of water treatment residual (WTR) in controlling P leaching. Soil samples with contrasting initial total P concentrations were prepared by mixing samples of a manure-impacted surface A horizon and a minimally P-impacted E horizon. Effects of mixing various ratios of A and E horizons, WTR rates (0, 25, 50, and 100 g kg^–1), and depths of WTR incorporation (mixed throughout the soil column or partially incorporated) on P leaching were determined. Between 62 and 77% of total P was released from the soil mixes by successive water extractions, suggesting a considerable buffering capacity of this manure-impacted soil to resupply P into solution. Between 224 and 408 mg kg^–1 P were leached during the 36-wk leaching period in the absence of WTR. Mixing WTRs with soil reduced soluble P concentration in leachates by as much as 99.8% compared with samples without WTR. Thoroughly mixing WTR with the entire soil column (15 cm) was much more efficient than mixing WTR with only the top 7.5 cm of soil. Calcium- and Mg-P forms appear to control P release in soils without WTR, whereas sorption–desorption reactions probably determine P leaching in WTR-treated samples. Soil P distribution in various chemical forms was affected by WTR additions. Data suggest that WTR-immobilized P is stable in the long term.

Abbreviations: DDI, distilled deionized water • DOC, dissolved organic carbon • EC, electrical conductivity • P_i, inorganic phosphorus • P_o, organic phosphorus • SRP, soluble reactive phosphorus • WTR, water treatment residual

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. W. Leader, E. J. Dunne, and K. R. Reddy Phosphorus Sorbing Materials: Sorption Dynamics and Physicochemical Characteristics J. Environ. Qual., January 4, 2008; 37(1): 174 - 181. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Agyin-Birikorang and G. A. O'Connor Lability of Drinking Water Treatment Residuals (WTR) Immobilized Phosphorus: Aging and pH Effects J. Environ. Qual., May 25, 2007; 36(4): 1076 - 1085. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]