HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Wang, E. Articles by Xu, C. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Wang, E. Articles by Xu, C. GeoRef GeoRef Citation Agricola Articles by Wang, E. Articles by Xu, C. Related Collections Soil Conservation Water Flow Models Best Management Practices Crop Models Soil Erosion

TECHNICAL REPORTS

Landscape and Watershed Processes

Predicting Soil Erosion for Alternative Land Uses

^a Department of Agribusiness, Tarleton State University, Box T-0050, Stephenville, TX 76402; School of Management, Dalian University of Technology, No. 2 Linggong Rd., Dalian, P.R. China 116024
^b China Agricultural University, Yuanmingyuanxilu no. 2, Beijing, P.R. China 100094; Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Chinese Academy of Science, Yangling, Shaanxi, P.R. China 712100
^c Blackland Research and Extension Center, Texas A&M University System, 720 E. Blackland Rd., Temple, TX 76502
^d China Agricultural University, Yuanmingyuanxilu no. 2, Beijing, P.R. China 100094

^* Corresponding author (changxincau{at}163.com)

Received for publication February 22, 2005. The APEX (Agricultural Policy–Environmental eXtender) model developed in the United States was calibrated for northwestern China's conditions. The model was then used to investigate soil erosion effects associated with alternative land uses at the ZFG (Zi-Fang-Gully) watershed in northwestern China. The results indicated that the APEX model could be calibrated reasonably well (±15% errors) to fit those areas with >50% slope within the watershed. Factors being considered during calibration include runoff, RUSLE (Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation) slope length and steepness factor, channel capacity flow rate, floodplain saturated hydraulic conductivity, and RUSLE C factor coefficient. No changes were made in the APEX computer code. Predictions suggest that reforestation is the best practice among the eight alternative land uses (the status quo, all grass, all grain, all grazing, all forest, half tree and half grass, 70% tree and 30% grain, and construction of a reservoir) for control of water runoff and soil erosion. Construction of a reservoir is the most effective strategy for controlling sediment yield although it does nothing to control upland erosion. For every 1 Mg of crop yield, 11 Mg of soil were lost during the 30-yr simulation period, suggesting that expanding land use for food production should not be encouraged on the ZFG watershed. Grass species are less effective than trees in controlling runoff and erosion on steep slopes because trees generally have deeper and more stable root systems.

Abbreviations: APEX, Agricultural Policy–Environmental eXtender • LP, Loess Plateau • RUSLE, Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation • ZFG, Zi-Fang-Gully

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. C. Sidle Comments on "Predicting Soil Erosion for Alternative Land Uses" by E. Wang, C. Xin, J.R. Williams, and C. Xu. J. Environ. Qual. 35:459-467 (2006) J. Environ. Qual., October 27, 2006; 35(6): 2435 - 2438. [Full Text] [PDF]