HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Cox, J. W. Articles by van Leeuwen, J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Cox, J. W. Articles by van Leeuwen, J. Agricola Articles by Cox, J. W. Articles by van Leeuwen, J. Related Collections Water Quality Runoff Nutrient Management Preferential Flow Phosphorus

Phosphorus Workshop

Using Gypsum to Reduce Phosphorus in Runoff from Subcatchments in South Australia

^a CSIRO Land and Water, PMB 2, Glen Osmond, SA, 5064, Australia
^b School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia

^* Corresponding author (jim.cox{at}csiro.au)

Received for publication January 15, 2005. Concentrations of phosphorus (P) in runoff from agricultural catchments in southern Australia are high and well above national and international limits. Phosphorus was found to exit two subcatchments of 3.6 and 4.2 ha in the Adelaide hills via both overland flow and interflow. The subcatchments had texture-contrast soils with high inputs of superphosphate and were openly grazed by cattle all year. Interflow at the boundary of the B and C soil horizons accounted for as much as half the total water flow that was measured (overland flow, A–B interflow, and B–C interflow). The average flow-weighted concentration of total P within overland flow was as high as 0.25 mg L^–1, and 0.05 mg L^–1 in B–C interflow. In most years P loss was in the dissolved (<0.45 µm) form. In some years, interflow was the major pathway for P loss off these catchments. The B–C interflow cannot be discounted when searching for management options to reduce P loss from texture-contrast soils to waterways. Preliminary laboratory experiments showed promise that gypsum could modify agricultural soils and reduce the concentrations of P (and dissolved organic C) in runoff before it enters public water supply reservoirs. In this study, gypsum, applied at a rate of 15 Mg ha^–1 to the 4.2-ha subcatchment, substantially modified the soil chemistry, and thereby soil structure. The size and stability of structural aggregates increased markedly and this change affected not only the A but also the upper B horizons, to a profile depth of approximately 50 cm. However, the impact of these physicochemical changes on P concentrations in runoff was not marked. Average profile P concentrations were only slightly lower in the runoff from the subcatchment following treatment. The high subsoil macroporosity of the gypsum-treated subcatchment caused an increase in the proportion of runoff by interflow.

Abbreviations: CEC, cation exchange capacity • DP, dissolved phosphorus • EP, extractable phosphorus • ESP, exchangeable sodium percentage • G0 and G15, soils treated with 0 and approximately 15 Mg ha^–1 of gypsum, respectively • ICP–OES, inductively coupled plasma–optical emission spectrometry • MRP, molybdate-reactive phosphorus • PP, particulate phosphorus • TP, total phosphorus • XRF, X-ray fluorescence