HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Related articles in JEQ Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (9) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Whitmire, S. L. Articles by Hamilton, S. K. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Whitmire, S. L. Articles by Hamilton, S. K. Agricola Articles by Whitmire, S. L. Articles by Hamilton, S. K. Related Collections Wetland Soils Biogeochemical Processes Wetlands and Aquatic Processes Microbial Processes Nitrogen

TECHNICAL REPORTS

Wetlands and Aquatic Processes

Rapid Removal of Nitrate and Sulfate in Freshwater Wetland Sediments

^a W.K. Kellogg Biological Station and Department of Zoology, Michigan State University, 3700 East Gull Lake Drive, Hickory Corners, MI 49060
^b Universidad de Puerto Rico, Recinto Universitario de Mayagüez, Departamento de Agronomía y Suelos, PO Box 9030, Mayagüez, PR 00681-9030

^* Corresponding author (Hamilton{at}kbs.msu.edu)

Received for publication July 2, 2004. Anaerobic microbial processes play particularly important roles in the biogeochemical functions of wetlands, affecting water quality, nutrient transport, and greenhouse gas fluxes. This study simultaneously examined nitrate and sulfate removal rates in sediments of five southwestern Michigan wetlands varying in their predominant water sources from ground water to precipitation. Rates were estimated using in situ push–pull experiments, in which 500 mL of anoxic local ground water containing ambient nitrate and sulfate and amended with bromide was injected into the near-surface sediments and subsequently withdrawn over time. All wetlands rapidly depleted nitrate added at ambient ground water concentrations within 5 to 20 h, with the rate dependent on concentration. Sulfate, which was variably present in porewaters, was also removed from injected ground water in all wetlands, but only after nitrate was depleted. The sulfate removal rate in ground water–fed wetlands was independent of concentration, in contrast to rates in precipitation-fed wetlands. Sulfate production was observed in some sites during the period of nitrate removal, suggesting that the added nitrate either stimulated sulfur oxidation, possibly by bacteria that can utilize nitrate as an oxidant, or inhibited sulfate reduction by stimulating denitrification. All wetland sediments examined were consistently capable of removing nitrate and sulfate at concentrations found in ground water and precipitation inputs, over short time and space scales. These results demonstrate how a remarkably small area of wetland sediment can strongly influence water quality, such as in the cases of narrow riparian zones or small isolated wetlands, which may be excluded from legal protection.

Abbreviations: DNRA, dissimilatory reduction of nitrate to ammonium • DOC, dissolved organic carbon • KBS, W.K. Kellogg Biological Station

Related articles in JEQ:

This Issue in Journal of Environmental Quality

JEQ 2005 34: v. [Full Text]