JEQ Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 12 October 2005
Published in J Environ Qual 34:1933-1943 (2005)
DOI: 10.2134/jeq2004.0460
© 2005 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Related articles in JEQ
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (8)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Beulke, S.
Right arrow Articles by Walker, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Beulke, S.
Right arrow Articles by Walker, A.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Beulke, S.
Right arrow Articles by Walker, A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Agricultural Pesticides
Right arrow Batch Studies
Right arrow Pesticides
Right arrow Solute Transport Models

TECHNICAL REPORTS

Bioremediation and Biodegradation

Evaluation of Simplifying Assumptions on Pesticide Degradation in Soil

Sabine Beulkea,*, Wendy van Beinuma, Colin D. Brownb, Matthew Mitchellc and Allan Walkerc

a Cranfield Centre for EcoChemistry, Cranfield University, Silsoe, Bedford, MK45 4DT, UK
b Environment Department, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK, and Central Science Laboratory, Sand Hutton, York, YO41 1LZ, UK
c Warwick HRI, University of Warwick, Wellesbourne, Warwick, CV35 9EF, UK

* Corresponding author (s.beulke{at}csl.gov.uk)

Received for publication November 26, 2004. There is evidence that degradation of pesticides in simple laboratory systems may differ from that in the field, but it is not clear which of the simplifications inherent in laboratory studies present serious shortcomings. Laboratory experiments evaluated several simplifying assumptions for a clay loam soil and contrasting pesticides. Degradation of cyanazine [2-(4-chloro-6-ethylamino-1,3,5-triazin-2-ylamino)-2-methylpropiononitrile] and bentazone [3-isopropyl-1H-2,1,3-benzothiadiazin-4(3H)-one 2,2-dioxide] at fluctuating temperature and moisture was predicted reasonably well based on parameters derived from degradation under constant conditions. There was a tendency for slower degradation of cyanazine and bentazone in soil aggregates of 3 to 5 mm in diameter (DT50 at 15°C and 40% maximum water holding capacity of 25.1 and 58.2 d, where DT50 is the time for 50% decline of the initial pesticide concentration) than in soil sieved to <3 mm (DT50 of 19.1 and 37.6 d), but the differences were not significant for most datasets. Degradation of cyanazine, isoproturon [3-(4-isopropylphenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea], and chlorotoluron [3-(3-chloro-p-tolyl)-1,1-dimethylurea] was measured in soil amended with different amounts of lignin. The effect of lignin on degradation was small despite considerable differences in sorption. The DT50 values of cyanazine, isoproturon, and chlorotoluron were 16.2, 18.6, and 33.0 d, respectively, in soil without lignin and 19.0, 23.4, and 34.6 d, respectively, in soil amended with 2% lignin. Degradation of bentazone and cyanazine in repacked soil columns was similar under static and flow conditions with 50.1 and 47.2% of applied bentazone and 74.7 and 73.6% of applied cyanazine, respectively, degraded within 20 d of application. Thus, the assumptions underpinning laboratory to field extrapolation tested here were considered to hold for our experimental system. Additional work is required before general conclusions can be drawn.

Abbreviations: DT50, time for 50% decline of the initial pesticide concentration • Kd, sorption coefficient • Koc, sorption coefficient normalized to organic carbon content • mwhc, maximum water holding capacity • Q10, factor by which degradation increases when temperature increases by 10°C


Related articles in JEQ:

This Issue in Journal of Environmental Quality

JEQ 2005 34: v. [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Environ. Qual.Home page
M. S. Rodriguez-Cruz, M. Valderrabano, C. del Hoyo, and M. J. Sanchez-Martin
Physicochemical Study of the Sorption of Pesticides by Wood Components
J. Environ. Qual., February 25, 2009; 38(2): 719 - 728.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Environ. Qual.Home page
M. Bridges, W. B. Henry, D. L. Shaner, R. Khosla, P. Westra, and R. Reich
Spatial Variability of Atrazine and Metolachlor Dissipation on Dryland No-tillage Crop Fields in Colorado
J. Environ. Qual., October 23, 2008; 37(6): 2212 - 2220.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Environ. Qual.Home page
L. J. Krutz, D. L. Shaner, C. Accinelli, R. M. Zablotowicz, and W. B. Henry
Atrazine Dissipation in s-Triazine-Adapted and Nonadapted Soil from Colorado and Mississippi: Implications of Enhanced Degradation on Atrazine Fate and Transport Parameters
J. Environ. Qual., May 1, 2008; 37(3): 848 - 857.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Environ. Qual.Home page
D. L. Shaner and W. B. Henry
Field History and Dissipation of Atrazine and Metolachlor in Colorado
J. Environ. Qual., January 9, 2007; 36(1): 128 - 134.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal Journal of Plant Registrations The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2005 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.