HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (3) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Leu, C. Articles by Stamm, C. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Leu, C. Articles by Stamm, C. Agricola Articles by Leu, C. Articles by Stamm, C. Related Collections Ecological Risk Assessment Organic Compounds Agricultural Pesticides Water Pollution

TECHNICAL REPORTS

Surface Water Quality

Comparison of Atrazine Losses in Three Small Headwater Catchments

^a Swiss Federal Institute for Environmental Science and Technology (EAWAG) and Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETHZ), Ueberlandstrasse 133, CH-8600 Dübendorf
^b Current address: Syngenta, Jealott's Hill International Research Centre, Bracknell, RG42 6EY, UK
^c Current address: Swiss Agency for the Environment, Forests and Landscape (SAEFL), 3003 Bern-Ittingen

^* Corresponding author (christian.stamm{at}eawag.ch)

Received for publication February 10, 2005. Understanding the processes causing herbicide transport to surface waters is crucial to determine mitigation options to reduce these losses. To this end, we investigated the atrazine (2-chloro-4-ethylamino-6-isopropylamino-1,3,5-triazine) transport in three agricultural catchments (1.1–2.1 km²) in the watershed of Lake "Greifensee" (Switzerland). In 1999, atrazine application data were recorded for all three catchments. Time proportional samples were taken at a high temporal resolution at the catchment outlets. Extremely wet conditions caused large relative losses from the catchments, ranging between 0.6 and 3.5% of the amount applied. Most of the atrazine load was due to event-driven diffuse losses from the fields. Farmyard runoff contributed less but caused the highest concentrations (up to 31 µg L^–1) in the brooks. The maximum concentrations due to diffuse losses varied between 1.2 and 8.2 µg L^–1 among the catchments. Despite different absolute concentration levels, the concentration time-series were very similar. It seems that the travel-times within the catchments were mainly controlled by the rainfall pattern with little influence of the catchment properties. These properties, however, caused the relative losses to vary by a factor of 6 between the catchments. This variability could be partly explained by differences in the connectivity of the fields to the brooks and by their hydrological soil properties. A comparison of the losses from the three catchments with those from the entire watershed of Lake Greifensee demonstrated that they were representative for the larger area. Hence, the study results provide a good data set to evaluate distributed models predicting herbicide losses.

Abbreviations: ELISA, enzyme linked immunosorbent assay • SPE-GC/MS, solid-phase extraction gas chromatography–mass spectrometry • WWTP, wastewater treatment plant