HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Related articles in JEQ Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (2) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Tomer, M. D. Articles by Kramer, L. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Tomer, M. D. Articles by Kramer, L. A. Agricola Articles by Tomer, M. D. Articles by Kramer, L. A. Related Collections Water Management Watershed and Landscape Processes Watershed-Scale Studies Best Management Practices Surface Hydrology

TECHNICAL REPORTS

Landscape and Watershed Processes

Agricultural Practices Influence Flow Regimes of Headwater Streams in Western Iowa

National Soil Tilth Lab., 2150 Pammel Dr., Ames, IA 50011

^* Corresponding author (tomer{at}nstl.gov)

Received for publication May 24, 2004. Agricultural tillage influences runoff and infiltration, but consequent effects on watershed hydrology are poorly documented. This study evaluated 25 yr (1971–1995) hydrologic records from four first-order watersheds in Iowa's loess hills. Two watersheds were under conventional tillage and two were under conservation (ridge) tillage, one of which was terraced. All four watersheds grew corn (Zea mays L.) every year. Flow-frequency statistics and autoregressive modeling were used to determine how conservation treatments influenced stream hydrology. The autoregressive modeling characterized variations in discharge, baseflow, and runoff at multi-year, annual, and shorter time scales. The ridge-tilled watershed (nonterraced) had 47% less runoff and 36% more baseflow than the conventional watershed of similar landform and slope. Recovery of baseflow after drought was quicker in the conservation watersheds, as evidenced by 365-d moving average plots, and 67% greater baseflow during the driest 2 yr. The two conventional watersheds were similar, except the steeper watershed discharged more runoff and baseflow during short (<30 d), wet periods. Significant multi-year and annual cycles occurred in all variables. Under ridge-till, seasonal (annual-cycle) variations in baseflow had greater amplitude, showing the seasonality of subsurface contaminant movement could increase under conservation practices. However, deviations from the modeled cycles of baseflow were also more persistent under conservation practices, indicating baseflow was more stable. Indeed, flow-frequency curves showed wet-weather discharge decreased and dry-weather discharge increased under conservation practices. Although mean discharge increased in the conservation watersheds, variance and skewness of daily values were smaller. Ridge tillage with or without terraces increased stream discharge but reduced its variability.

Abbreviations: PET, potential evapotranspiration • W1, W2, W3, W4, Watershed 1, Watershed 2, Watershed 3, Watershed 4

Related articles in JEQ:

This Issue in Journal of Environmental Quality

JEQ 2005 34: 0. [Full Text]  

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. N. Sharpley, P. J. A. Kleinman, A. L. Heathwaite, W. J. Gburek, G. J. Folmar, and J. P. Schmidt Phosphorus Loss from an Agricultural Watershed as a Function of Storm Size J. Environ. Qual., March 1, 2008; 37(2): 362 - 368. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. D. Tomer, C. A. Cambardella, D. E. James, and T. B. Moorman Surface-Soil Properties and Water Contents across Two Watersheds with Contrasting Tillage Histories Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., February 27, 2006; 70(2): 620 - 630. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]