JEQ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 20 April 2005
Published in J Environ Qual 34:936-942 (2005)
DOI: 10.2134/jeq2004.0024
© 2005 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Related articles in JEQ
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bedessem, M. E.
Right arrow Articles by Roll, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bedessem, M. E.
Right arrow Articles by Roll, R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Bedessem, M. E.
Right arrow Articles by Roll, R.
Related Collections
Right arrow Ground Water Quality
Right arrow Nutrients
Right arrow Disposal Facilities
Right arrow Water Pollution
Right arrow Nitrogen

TECHNICAL REPORTS

Waste Management

Nitrogen Removal in Laboratory Model Leachfields with Organic-Rich Layers

Marjorie E. Bedessem*, Thomas V. Edgar and Robert Roll

Department of Civil and Architectural Engineering, 1000 East University Avenue, Department 3295, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY 82071

* Corresponding author (bedessem{at}uwyo.edu)

Received for publication January 20, 2004. Septic system leachfields can release dissolved nitrogen in the form of nitrate into ground water, presenting a significant source of pollution. Low cost, passive modifications, which increase N removal in traditional leachfields, could substantially reduce the overall impact on ground water resources. Bench-scale laboratory models were constructed to evaluate the effect of placing an organic layer below the leachfield on total N removal. The organic layer provides a carbon source for denitrification. Column units representing septic leachfields were constructed with sawdust–native soil organic layers placed 0.45 m below the influent line and with thicknesses of 0.0, 0.3, 0.6, and 0.9 m. Using a synthetic septic tank effluent, NO3–N concentrations at 3.8 m below the influent line were consistently below 1 mg L–1 during 10 months of operation compared with a NO3–N concentration of nearly 12 mg L–1 in the control column. The average total N removal increased from 31% without the organic layer to 67% with the organic layer. Total N removal appeared limited by the extent of organic N oxidation and nitrification in the 0.45-m aerobic zone. Design modifications targeted at improving nitrification above the organic layer may further increase total N removal. Increased organic layer thicknesses from 0.3 m to 0.9 m did not significantly improve average total N removal, but caused a shift in residual nitrogen from organic N to ammonia N. Results indicate that addition of a layer of carbon source material at least 0.3 m thick below a standard leachfield substantially improves total N removal.

Abbreviations: BOD5, five-day biochemical oxygen demand • MCL, maximum contaminant level • TKN, total Kjeldahl nitrogen


Related articles in JEQ:

This Issue in Journal of Environmental Quality

JEQ 2005 34: ix. [Full Text]  






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Copyright © 2005 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.