HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Related articles in JEQ Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (2) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Holtzman, R. Articles by Vengosh, A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Holtzman, R. Articles by Vengosh, A. GeoRef GeoRef Citation Agricola Articles by Holtzman, R. Articles by Vengosh, A. Related Collections Surface Water Quality Watershed and Landscape Processes Watershed-Scale Studies Geochemical Processes Water Pollution

TECHNICAL REPORTS

Surface Water Quality

Quantifying Ground Water Inputs along the Lower Jordan River

^a Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Technion, Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa 32000, Israel
^b Geological Survey of Israel, 30 Malkhe Israel Street, Jerusalem 95501, Israel
^c Faculty of Science and Technology, Al-Quds University, P.O. Box 20002, East Jerusalem
^d Department of Geological and Environmental Sciences, Ben Gurion University, PO Box 653, Beer Sheva 84105, Israel

^* Corresponding author (aguri{at}technion.ac.il)

Received for publication June 26, 2004. The flow rate of the Lower Jordan River has changed dramatically during the second half of the 20th century. The diversion of its major natural sources reduced its flow rate and led to drying events during the drought years of 2000 and 2001. Under these conditions of low flow rates, the potential influence of external sources on the river discharge and chemical composition became significant. Our measurements show that the concentrations of chloride, calcium, and sodium in the river water decrease along the first 20-km section, while sulfate and magnesium concentrations increase. These variations were addressed by a recent geochemical study, suggesting that ground water inflow plays a major role. To further examine the role of ground water, we applied mass-balance calculations, using detailed flow rate measurements, water samplings, and chemical analyses along the northern (upstream) part of the river. Our flow-rate measurements showed that the river base-flow during 2000 and 2001 was 500 to 1100 L s^–1, which is about 40 times lower than the historical flow rates. Our measurements and calculations indicate that ground water input was 20 to 80% of the river water flow, and 20 to 50% of its solute mass flow. This study independently identifies the composition of possible end-members. These end-members contain high sulfate concentration and have similar chemical characteristics as were found in agricultural drains and in the "saline" Yarmouk River. Future regional development plans that include the river flow rate and chemistry should consider the interactions between the river and its shallow ground water system.

Related articles in JEQ:

This Issue in Journal of Environmental Quality

JEQ 2005 34: ix. [Full Text]