HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Related articles in JEQ Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (8) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Larsbo, M. Articles by Jarvis, N. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Larsbo, M. Articles by Jarvis, N. Agricola Articles by Larsbo, M. Articles by Jarvis, N. Related Collections Vadose Zone Processes and Chemical Transport Pesticides Dual Porosity/Permeability Models Solute Transport Models

TECHNICAL REPORTS

Vadose Zone Processes and Chemical Transport

Simulating Solute Transport in a Structured Field Soil

Uncertainty in Parameter Identification and Predictions

Department of Soil Sciences, SLU, Box 7014, 750 07 Uppsala, Sweden

^* Corresponding author (Mats.Larsbo{at}mv.slu.se)

Received for publication April 13, 2004. Dual-permeability models have been developed to account for the significant effects of macropore flow on contaminant transport, but their use is hampered by difficulties in estimating the additional parameters required. Therefore, our objective was to evaluate data requirements for parameter identification for predictive modeling with the dual-permeability model MACRO. Two different approaches were compared: sequential uncertainty fitting (SUFI) and generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation (GLUE). We investigated six parameters controlling macropore flow and pesticide sorption and degradation, applying MACRO to a comprehensive field data set of bromide andbentazone [3-isopropyl-1H-2,1,3-benzothiadiazin-4(3H)-one-2,2dioxide] transport in a structured soil. The GLUE analyses of parameter conditioning for different combinations of observations showed that both resident and flux concentrations were needed to obtain highly conditioned and unbiased parameters and that observations of tracer transport generally improved the conditioning of macropore flow parameters. The GLUE "behavioral" parameter sets covered wider parameter ranges than the SUFI posterior uncertainty domains. Nevertheless, estimation uncertainty ranges defined by the 5th and 95th percentiles were similar and many simulations randomly sampled from the SUFI posterior uncertainty domains had negative model efficiencies (minimum of –3.2). This is because parameter correlations are neglected in SUFI and the posterior uncertainty domains were not always determined correctly. For the same reasons, uncertainty ranges for predictions of bentazone losses through drainflow for good agricultural practice in southern Sweden were 27% larger for SUFI compared with GLUE. Although SUFI proved to be an efficient parameter estimation tool, GLUE seems better suited as a method of uncertainty estimation for predictions.

Abbreviations: EF, model efficiency • GLUE, generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation • SUFI, sequential uncertainty fitting

Related articles in JEQ:

This Issue in Journal of Environmental Quality

JEQ 2005 34: 403-407. [Full Text]  

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. Boivin, J. Simunek, M. Schiavon, and M. Th. van Genuchten Comparison of Pesticide Transport Processes in Three Tile-Drained Field Soils Using HYDRUS-2D Vadose Zone J., June 21, 2006; 5(3): 838 - 849. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]