HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Related articles in JEQ Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (1) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Bazen, E. F. Articles by Fleming, R. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Bazen, E. F. Articles by Fleming, R. A. Agricola Articles by Bazen, E. F. Articles by Fleming, R. A. Related Collections Economics Land-use Planning Air Pollution Spatial Distribution Animal Waste

ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES

An Economic Evaluation of Livestock Odor Regulation Distances

^a Dep. of Agric. Econ., Univ. of Tennessee, 2621 Morgan Circle, 325-A Morgan Hall, Knoxville, TN 37996
^b Dep. of Agric. Econ., Univ. of Kentucky, 302 Agricultural Engineering Bldg., Lexington, KY 40546

^* Corresponding author (ebazen{at}utk.edu)

Received for publication January 9, 2004. Setback regulations—legislated distances that livestock production facilities must be removed from surrounding properties—are meant to mitigate odor impacts. If the setback length is too short, then there is evidence that surrounding properties and people suffer uncompensated damages. If, on the other hand, setback lengths are too long, then livestock producers may be paying more than that required to compensate for odor-related environmental damages. The purpose of this study is to assess the impact of Kentucky's livestock production facility setbacks on the value of surrounding properties and farm financial management decisions. This paper develops a model of the benefits of livestock odor reduction and the livestock odor abatement cost associated with setback lengths paid by producers. The results of this investigation indicate that the mandated setback lengths for Kentucky are too short. Livestock production firms are worse off under longer setback lengths, but the losses to surrounding home owners far exceed the firm gains at the mandated setbacks. A finding of this study is that the firm has no incentive to completely protect the legislated setback length. Livestock producers in compliance with the relevant setback length may feel protected from odor lawsuits despite damage being done to surrounding property. This suggests that the perceived threat of lawsuit is currently low in the state of Kentucky. Both industry and public goals could be met from further research including location and economic impact of livestock production.

Abbreviations: AEU, animal equivalent units • BMP, best management practice • CAFO, confined animal feeding operation • FOC, first order conditions • GAMS, General Algebraic Modeling System • KFBM, Kentucky Farm Business Management • NREPC, Natural Resources and Environmental Protection Cabinet • SOC, second order conditions. (See the Appendix for a list of other symbols or abbreviations with their definitions and units.)

Related articles in JEQ:

This Issue in Journal of Environmental Quality

JEQ 2004 33: 1947-1953. [Full Text]  

This article has been cited by other articles:

				V. Blanes-Vidal, M. N. Hansen, and P. Sousa Reduction of Odor and Odorant Emissions from Slurry Stores by Means of Straw Covers J. Environ. Qual., May 20, 2009; 38(4): 1518 - 1527. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]