HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Related articles in JEQ Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (7) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Potts, D. A. Articles by Amador, J. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Potts, D. A. Articles by Amador, J. A. Agricola Articles by Potts, D. A. Articles by Amador, J. A. Related Collections Water Quality Nitrogen Microbial Processes Vadose Zone Processes and Chemical Transport

TECHNICAL REPORTS

Vadose Zone Processes and Chemical Transport

Effects of Aeration on Water Quality from Septic System Leachfields

^a Geomatrix, LLC, Killingworth, CT 06419
^b Laboratory of Soil Ecology and Microbiology, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI 02881

^* Corresponding author (jam7740u{at}postoffice.uri.edu).

Received for publication December 8, 2003. We conducted a pilot-scale study at a research facility in southeastern Connecticut to assess the effects of leachfield aeration on removal of nutrients and pathogens from septic system effluent. Treatments consisted of lysimeters periodically aerated to maintain a headspace O₂ concentration of 0.209 mol mol^–1 (AIR) or vented to an adjacent leachfield trench (LEACH) and were replicated three times. All lysimeters were dosed with effluent from a septic tank for 24 mo at a rate of 12 cm d^–1 and subsequently for 2 mo at 4 cm d^–1. LEACH lysimeters had developed a clogging mat, or biomat, 20 mo before the beginning of our study. The level of aeration in the AIR treatment was held constant regardless of loading rate. No conventional biomat developed in the AIR treatment, whereas a biomat was present in the LEACH lysimeters. The headspace of LEACH lysimeters was considerably depleted in O₂ and enriched in CH₄, CO₂, and H₂S relative to AIR lysimeters. Drainage water from AIR lysimeters was saturated with O₂ and had significantly lower pH, five-day biological oxygen demand (BOD₅), and ammonium, and higher levels of nitrate and sulfate than LEACH lysimeters regardless of dosing rate. By contrast, significantly lower levels of total N and fecal coliform bacteria were observed in AIR than in LEACH lysimeters only at the higher dosing rate. No significant differences in total P removal were observed. Our results suggest that aeration may improve the removal of nitrogen, BOD₅, and fecal coliforms in leachfield soil, even in the absence of a biomat.

Abbreviations: AIR, aerated lysimeters • BOD₅, five-day biological oxygen demand • LEACH, lysimeters vented to leachfield

Related articles in JEQ:

This Issue in Journal of Environmental Quality

JEQ 2004 33: 1589-1599. [Full Text]  

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L. W. Gill, C. O'Sulleabhain, B. D. R. Misstear, and P. J. Johnston The Treatment Performance of Different Subsoils in Ireland Receiving On-Site Wastewater Effluent J. Environ. Qual., October 24, 2007; 36(6): 1843 - 1855. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. A. Amador, D. A. Potts, M. C. Savin, P. Tomlinson, J. H. Gorres, and E. L. Nicosia Mesocosm-Scale Evaluation of Faunal and Microbial Communities of Aerated and Unaerated Leachfield Soil J. Environ. Qual., May 31, 2006; 35(4): 1160 - 1169. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]