HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Related articles in JEQ Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (2) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Lory, J. A. Articles by Fulhage, C. D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Lory, J. A. Articles by Fulhage, C. D. Agricola Articles by Lory, J. A. Articles by Fulhage, C. D. Related Collections Best Management Practices Nitrogen Agricultural Systems Nutrient Management Animal Waste

TECHNICAL REPORTS

Waste Management

An Assessment of Nitrogen-Based Manure Application Rates on 39 U.S. Swine Operations

^a Department of Agronomy, 210 Waters Hall, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211
^b Department of Agricultural Economics, 223 Mumford Hall, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211
^c Department of Biological Engineering, 207 Agricultural Engineering Building, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211
^d Department of Animal Science, 133 Animal Sciences Center, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211

^* Corresponding author (loryj{at}missouri.edu).

Received for publication July 16, 2003. Water quality concerns and revised regulations are changing how confined animal feeding operations manage manure. Devising acceptable and feasible changes in manure practices requires a full understanding of the forces shaping current manure management decisions. Previous theoretical models have shown that a wide range of factors influence the lowest cost solution for manure management. We used a mechanistic model to characterize the manure management practices on 39 swine operations (20 unagitated lagoon and 19 slurry operations) in five states (Iowa, Missouri, North Carolina, Oklahoma, and Pennsylvania). Information was collected from each operation about animal numbers, feed and water use, manure handling and storage characteristics, field locations, crop rotation, fertilizer need, and equipment inventory and usage. Collected data were used as input and to validate results from a mechanistic model that determined acres required for manure application, manure application rate, time required for manure application, value of manure, and costs of manure management. The 39 farms had a mean of 984 animal units (AU) per operation, 18.2 AU ha^–1 (7.4 AU acre^–1), and manure application costs of $10.49 AU^–1 yr^–1. Significant factors affecting manure management included operation size, manure handling system, state, and ownership structure. Larger operations had lower manure management costs (r² = 0.32). Manure value potentially exceeded manure application costs on 58% of slurry and 15% of lagoon operations. But 38% of slurry operations needed to apply manure off the farm whereas all lagoon operations had sufficient land for N-based manure management. Manure management was a higher percentage of gross income on contract operations compared with independents (P < 0.01). This research emphasized the importance of site-specific factors affecting manure management decisions and the economics of U.S. swine operations.

Abbreviations: AU, animal unit

Related articles in JEQ:

This Issue in Journal of Environmental Quality

JEQ 2004 33: 799-804. [Full Text]  

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M.D. Tomer, T.B. Moorman, D.E. James, G. Hadish, and C.G. Rossi Assessment of the Iowa River's South Fork watershed: Part 2. Conservation practices Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, November 1, 2008; 63(6): 371 - 379. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. S. Paschold, B. J. Wienhold, D. L. McCallister, and R. B. Ferguson Crop Nitrogen and Phosphorus Utilization following Application of Slurry from Swine Fed Traditional or Low Phytate Corn Diets Agron. J., June 16, 2008; 100(4): 997 - 1004. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. A. Lory, R. E. Massey, J. M. Zulovich, J. A. Hoehne, A. M. Schmidt, M. S. Carlson, and C. D. Fulhage Feasibility and Costs of Phosphorus Application Limits on 39 U.S. Swine Operations J. Environ. Qual., May 1, 2004; 33(3): 1114 - 1123. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]