HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Related articles in JEQ Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (5) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Hanselman, T. A. Articles by Obreza, T. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Hanselman, T. A. Articles by Obreza, T. A. Agricola Articles by Hanselman, T. A. Articles by Obreza, T. A. Related Collections Animal Waste Municipal Waste Nutrient Cycling Nutrient Management Nitrogen

TECHNICAL REPORTS

Waste Management

A Comparison of In Situ Methods for Measuring Net Nitrogen Mineralization Rates of Organic Soil Amendments

Soil and Water Science Department, 106 Newell Hall, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611-0510

^* Corresponding author (taha{at}mail.ifas.ufl.edu).

Received for publication June 10, 2003. In situ incubation methods may help provide site-specific estimates of N mineralization from land-applied wastes. However, there are concerns about the reliability of the data generated by the various methods due to containment artifacts. We amended a sandy soil with either poultry manure, biosolids, or yard-waste compost and incubated the mixtures using four in situ methods (buried bags, covered cylinders, standard resin traps, and "new" soil–resin traps) and a conventional laboratory technique in plastic bags. Each incubation device was destructively sampled at 45-d intervals for 180 d and net N mineralization was determined by measuring the amount of inorganic N that accumulated in the soil or soil plus resin traps. Containment effects were evaluated by comparing water content of the containerized soil to a field-reference soil column. In situ incubation methods provided reasonable estimates of short-term (<45 d) N mineralization, but long-term (>45 d) mineralization data were not accurate due to a variety of problems specific to each technique. Buried bags and covered cylinders did not retain mineralized N due to water movement into and out of the containers. Neither resin method captured all of the mineralized N that leached through the soil columns, but the new soil–resin trap method tracked field soil water content better than all other in situ methods evaluated. With further refinement and validation, the new soil–resin trap method may be a useful in situ incubation technique for measuring net N mineralization rates of organic soil amendments.

Related articles in JEQ:

This Issue in Journal of Environmental Quality

JEQ 2004 33: 799-804. [Full Text]