HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Related articles in JEQ Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (9) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Miller, J. J. Articles by Hasselback, P. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Miller, J. J. Articles by Hasselback, P. Agricola Articles by Miller, J. J. Articles by Hasselback, P. Related Collections Water Quality Surface Water Quality Surface Hydrology Other Environmental Contamination Animal Waste

TECHNICAL REPORTS

Waste Management

Quantity and Quality of Runoff from a Beef Cattle Feedlot in Southern Alberta

^a Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, P.O. Box 3000, Lethbridge, AB, Canada T1J 4B1
^b Alberta Agriculture, Food and Rural Development, Lethbridge, AB, Canada T1J 4V6
^c Department of Biological Sciences, 4401 University Drive, University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, AB, Canada T1K 3M4
^d Department of Renewable Resources, General Services Building, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada T6G 2H1
^e Chinook Regional Health Authority, 960-19th Street South, Lethbridge, AB, Canada T1J 1W5

^* Corresponding author (millerjj{at}agr.gc.ca).

Received for publication June 5, 2003. Southern Alberta, which has a cold climate dominated by strong chinook winds, has the highest density of feedlot cattle in Canada. However, the quantity and quality of runoff from beef cattle (Bos taurus) feedlots in this unique region has not been investigated. Our objectives were to compare runoff quantity (1998–2002) with catch-basin design criteria; determine concentrations of selected inorganic chemical parameters (1998–2000) in runoff in relation to water quality guidelines and the potential implications of irrigating adjacent cropland; and determine if total heterotrophs, total coliforms, and Escherichia coli (1998–2000) persisted in the catch-basin water and soil. Runoff (<0.1 to 42.5 mm) for a 24-h duration that included maximum peak discharge was less than the recommended design criteria of 90 mm based on runoff from 24 h of rainfall with a 30-yr return period. We found that curve numbers between 52 and 96 (mode of 90) were required to match the USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service predicted runoff and actual runoff volumes. Total P posed the greatest threat to water quality guidelines, and K posed the greatest threat for exceeding crop fertilizer requirements if catch-basin effluent was used as irrigation water. Water in the catch basin had continually high populations of E. coli throughout the study, with values ranging between log₁₀ 2 and log₁₀ 8 100 mL^–1. In contrast, soil in the catch basin generally had low populations of E. coli that were <log₁₀ 2 g^–1 wet wt., but at times higher populations between log₁₀ 2 and log₁₀ 6 g^–1 wet wt. were also found.

Abbreviations: CN, curve number • EC, electrical conductivity • TAH, total aerobic heterotrophs • TC, total coliforms

Related articles in JEQ:

This Issue in Journal of Environmental Quality

JEQ 2004 33: 799-804. [Full Text]  

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. J. Miller, E. C. S. Olson, D. S. Chanasyk, B. W. Beasley, L. J. Yanke, F. J. Larney, T. A. McAllister, B. M. Olson, and L. B. Selinger Bedding and Within-Pen Location Effects on Feedlot Pen Runoff Quality Using a Rainfall Simulator J. Environ. Qual., February 2, 2006; 35(2): 505 - 515. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]