| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
a Department of Soil Science, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1525 Observatory Dr., Madison, WI 53706
b USDA Dairy Forage Research Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1925 Linden Drive West, Madison, WI 53706
* Corresponding author (kkelling{at}wisc.edu).
Received for publication January 26, 2003. Measurements of dairy manure nutrient availability to crops typically show great variability. Approaches that are more accurate are needed to improve manure management and reduce nutrient loss to the environment. In this study, we compared direct (15N recovery) and indirect (difference method [Diff Meth] and fertilizer equivalence [FE] approach) methods of determining first-year dairy manure N availability or recovery during three cropping seasons. A field experiment was conducted on a Plano silt loam (fine-silty, mixed, superactive, mesic Typic Argiudolls) planted to corn (Zea mays L.). Plots received either manure, fertilizer N, or no N. Microplots receiving 15N-labeled manure were also established each study year. Manure was applied to a new plot each cropping season. Whole-plant N uptake was the best crop parameter to use for FE estimates. Estimates of N availability by relative effectiveness (Rel Eff), which are derived from the Diff Meth, and FE were similar (32 and 41%, respectively) and higher than unlabeled N or 15N recovery measurements because these indices factor in N use efficiency. Measures of the Rel Eff of manure N use were highly affected by control plot N uptake. The FE approach is less influenced by control plots, but it requires the inclusion of several more treatments and use of mathematical functions to describe crop response to N. These limitations are reflected in the wide ranges obtained for N availability estimates (–60 to 148%). Although apparent N recovery by the Diff Meth (14%) or direct measurements of 15N recovery (16%) were close on average, variability tended to be much lower for the 15N method. In addition, the Diff Meth was highly dependent on initial soil conditions. Use of 15N-labeled manure, although more costly and time-consuming, provided more consistent and reliable results.
Abbreviations: Diff Meth, difference method • FE, fertilizer equivalence • GNU, grain nitrogen uptake • GY, grain yield • Rel Eff, relative effectiveness • TKN, total Kjeldahl nitrogen • WPNU, whole-plant nitrogen uptake • WPY, whole-plant yield
Related articles in JEQ:
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  G. R. Munoz, K. A. Kelling, K. E. Rylant, and J. Zhu Field Evaluation of Nitrogen Availability from Fresh and Composted Manure J. Environ. Qual., May 1, 2008; 37(3): 944 - 955. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. R. Cusick, K. A. Kelling, J. M. Powell, and G. R. Munoz Estimates of Residual Dairy Manure Nitrogen Availability Using Various Techniques J. Environ. Qual., October 27, 2006; 35(6): 2170 - 2177. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. Sorensen and I. K. Thomsen Separation of Pig Slurry and Plant Utilization and Loss of Nitrogen-15-labeled Slurry Nitrogen Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., August 25, 2005; 69(5): 1644 - 1651. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. M. Powell, K. A. Kelling, G. R. Munoz, and P. R. Cusick EVALUATION OF DAIRY MANURE NITROGEN-15 ENRICHMENT METHODS ON SHORT-TERM CROP AND SOIL NITROGEN BUDGETS Agron. J., January 1, 2005; 97(1): 333 - 337. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| The SCI Journals | Agronomy Journal | Crop Science | |||
| Vadose Zone Journal | Journal of Plant Registrations | ||||
| Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education |
Soil Science Society of America Journal |
