JEQ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Related articles in JEQ
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (10)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Demchak, J.
Right arrow Articles by McDonald, L. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Demchak, J.
Right arrow Articles by McDonald, L. M.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Demchak, J.
Right arrow Articles by McDonald, L. M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Watershed and Landscape Processes
Right arrow Surface Water Quality
Right arrow Water Pollution
Right arrow Ground Water Quality
Published in J. Environ. Qual. 33:656-668 (2004).
© ASA, CSSA, SSSA
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA

TECHNICAL REPORT

Surface Water Quality

Longevity of Acid Discharges from Underground Mines Located above the Regional Water Table

J. Demchaka, J. Skousen*,b and L. M. McDonaldb

a 629 East Rolling Ridge Drive, Penn Eagle Industrial Park, Bellefonte, PA 16823
b Plant and Soil Science, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26506

* Corresponding author (jskousen{at}wvu.edu).

Received for publication April 8, 2003. The duration of acid mine drainage flowing out of underground mines is important in the design of watershed restoration and abandoned mine land reclamation projects. Past studies have reported that acid water flows from underground mines for hundreds of years with little change, while others state that poor drainage quality may last only 20 to 40 years. More than 150 above-drainage (those not flooded after abandonment) underground mine discharges from Pittsburgh and Upper Freeport coal seams were located and sampled during 1968 in northern West Virginia, and we revisited 44 of those sites in 1999–2000 and measured water flow, pH, acidity, Fe, sulfate, and conductivity. We found no significant difference in flows between 1968 and 1999–2000. Therefore, we felt the water quality data could be compared and the data represented real changes in pollutant concentrations. There were significant water quality differences between year and coal seam, but no effect of disturbance. While pH was not significantly improved, average total acidity declined 79% between 1968 and 1999–2000 in Pittsburgh mines (from 66.8 to 14 mmol H+ L–1) and 56% in Upper Freeport mines (from 23.8 to 10.4 mmol H+ L–1). Iron decreased an average of about 80% across all sites (from an average of 400 to 72 mg L–1), while sulfate decreased between 50 and 75%. Pittsburgh seam discharge water was much worse in 1968 than Upper Freeport seam water. Twenty of our 44 sites had water quality information in 1980, which served as a midpoint to assess the slope of the decline in acidity and metal concentrations. Five of 20 sites (25%) showed an apparent exponential rate of decline in acidity and iron, while 10 of 20 sites (50%) showed a more linear decline. Drainage from five Upper Freeport sites increased in acidity and iron. While it is clear that surface mines and below-drainage underground mines improve in discharge quality relatively rapidly (20–40 years), above-drainage underground mines are not as easily predicted. In total, the drainage from 34 out of 44 (77%) above-drainage underground mines showed significant improvement in acidity over time, some exponentially and some linearly. Ten discharges showed no improvement and three of these got much worse.

Abbreviations: AMD, acid mine drainage


Related articles in JEQ:

This Issue in Journal of Environmental Quality

JEQ 2004 33: 413-418. [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Environmental GeosciencesHome page
A. J. Morris, A. J. Morris, J. J. Donovan, and J. E. Thies
Reconnaissance spatial analysis of the hydrogeology of closed underground coal mines
Environmental Geosciences, December 1, 2008; 15(4): 183 - 197.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Environ. Qual.Home page
T. S. Rotting, R. C. Thomas, C. Ayora, and J. Carrera
Passive Treatment of Acid Mine Drainage with High Metal Concentrations Using Dispersed Alkaline Substrate
J. Environ. Qual., August 8, 2008; 37(5): 1741 - 1751.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
A. S. Grandy, G. P. Robertson, and K. D. Thelen
Do Productivity and Environmental Trade-offs Justify Periodically Cultivating No-till Cropping Systems?
Agron. J., October 3, 2006; 98(6): 1377 - 1383.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal Journal of Plant Registrations The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2004 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.