HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Related articles in JEQ Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (6) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by McConnell, L. L. Articles by Hagy, J. D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by McConnell, L. L. Articles by Hagy, J. D., III Agricola Articles by McConnell, L. L. Articles by Hagy, J. D. Related Collections Agricultural Pesticides Pesticides Organic Compounds Water Pollution

TECHNICAL REPORT

Organic Compounds in the Environment

Measured Concentrations of Herbicides and Model Predictions of Atrazine Fate in the Patuxent River Estuary

^a USDA-ARS, Environmental Quality Laboratory, Building 007, Room 225, Beltsville, MD 20705
^b USDA-ARS, Environmental Chemistry Laboratory, Building 007, Room 203, Beltsville, MD 20705
^c III, USEPA, NHEERL/Gulf Ecology Division, 1 Sabine Island Drive, Gulf Breeze, FL 32561

^* Corresponding author (mcconnel{at}ba.ars.usda.gov).

Received for publication January 3, 2003. The environmental fate of herbicides in estuaries is poorly understood. Estuarine physical transport processes and the episodic nature of herbicide release into surface waters complicate interpretation of water concentration measurements and allocation of sources. Water concentrations of herbicides and two triazine degradation products (CIAT [6-amino-2-chloro-4-isopropylamino-s-triazine] and CEAT [6-amino-2-chloro-4-ethylamino-s-triazine]) were measured in surface water from four sites on 40 d from 4 Apr. through 29 July 1996 in the Patuxent River estuary, part of the Chesapeake Bay system. Atrazine (2-chloro-4-ethylamino-6-isopropylamino-1,3,5-triazine) was most persistent and present in the highest concentrations (maximum = 1.29 µg/L). Metolachlor [2-chloro-6'-ethyl-N-(2-methoxy-1-methylethyl)-o-acetoluidide], CIAT, CEAT, and simazine (1-chloro-3,5-bisethylamino-2,4,6-triazine) were frequently detected with maximum concentration values of 0.61, 1.1, 0.76, and 0.49 µg/L, respectively. A physical transport model was used to interpret atrazine concentrations in the context of estuarine water transport, giving estimates of in situ degradation rates and total transport. The estimated half-life of atrazine in the turbid, shallow upper estuary was t_1/2 = 20 d, but was much longer (t_1/2 = 100 d) in the deeper lower estuary. Although most (93%) atrazine entered the estuary upstream via the river, simulations suggested additional inputs directly to the lower estuary. The total atrazine load to the estuary from 5 April to 15 July was 71 kg with 48% loss by degradation and 31% exported to the Chesapeake Bay. Atrazine persistence in the estuary is directly related to river flows into the estuary. Low flows will increase atrazine residence time in the upper estuary and increase degradation losses.

Related articles in JEQ:

This Issue in Journal of Environmental Quality

JEQ 2004 33: 413-418. [Full Text]