HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Related articles in JEQ Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (4) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by White, S. K. Articles by Bauder, T. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by White, S. K. Articles by Bauder, T. A. Agricola Articles by White, S. K. Articles by Bauder, T. A. Related Collections Surface Water Quality Best Management Practices Forage Management Other Forage Crops

TECHNICAL REPORTS

Surface Water Quality

Irrigated Mountain Meadow Fertilizer Application Timing Effects on Overland Flow Water Quality

^a Department of Rangeland Ecosystem Science, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523
^b Colorado State University Mountain Meadow Research Center, P.O. Box 598, Gunnison, CO 81230
^c USDA Agricultural Research Service, Rangeland Resources Research Unit, Fort Collins, CO 80526
^d Department of Soil and Crop Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523

^* Corresponding author (jbrummer{at}lamar.colostate.edu).

Nonpoint-source pollution from agricultural activities is currently the leading cause of degradation of waterways in the United States. Applying best management practices to flood-irrigated mountain meadows may improve agricultural runoff and return flow water quality. Prior research has focused on fertilizer use for increased hay yields, while few studies have investigated the environmental implications of this practice. We examined the effects of fertilizer application timing on overland flow water quality from an irrigated mountain meadow near Gunnison, Colorado. Application of 40 kg phosphorus (P) and 19 kg nitrogen (N) ha^-1 using monoammonium phosphate (11–52–0, N–P–K) fertilizer to plots in the fall significantly reduced concentrations of reactive P and ammonium N in irrigation overland flow compared with early or late spring fertilization. Reactive P loading was 9 to almost 16 times greater when fertilizer was applied in the early or late spring, respectively, compared with in the fall. Ammonium N followed a similar trend with early spring loading more than 18 times greater and late spring loading more than 34 times greater than loads from fall-fertilized plots. Losses of 45% of the applied P and more than 17% of the N were measured in runoff when fertilizer was applied in the late spring. These results, coupled with those from previous studies, suggest that mountain meadow hay producers should apply fertilizer in the fall, especially P-based fertilizers, to improve hay yields, avoid economic losses from loss of applied fertilizers, and reduce the potential for impacts to water quality.

Abbreviations: MAP, monoammonium phosphate fertilizer • NPS, nonpoint source

Related articles in JEQ:

This Issue in Journal of Environmental Quality

JEQ 2003 32: 1577-1582. [Full Text]  

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. J. A. Kleinman, M. S. Srinivasan, C. J. Dell, J. P. Schmidt, A. N. Sharpley, and R. B. Bryant Role of Rainfall Intensity and Hydrology in Nutrient Transport via Surface Runoff. J. Environ. Qual., July 1, 2006; 35(4): 1248 - 1259. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]