JEQ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Related articles in JEQ
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Börjesson, E.
Right arrow Articles by Torstensson, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Börjesson, E.
Right arrow Articles by Torstensson, L.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Börjesson, E.
Right arrow Articles by Torstensson, L.
Related Collections
Right arrow Agricultural Pesticides
Right arrow Bioremediation and Biodegradation
Journal of Environmental Quality 32:1258-1261 (2003)
© 2003 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America

TECHNICAL REPORTS
Bioremediation and Biodegradation

Comparison of Triticonazole Dissipation after Seed or Soil Treatment

Elisabet Börjesson*,a, John Stenströma, Lennart Johnssonb and Lennart Torstenssona

a Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Microbiology, P.O. Box 7025, SE-750 07 Uppsala, Sweden
b Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Plant Pathology and Biocontrol Unit, P.O. Box 7035, SE-750 07 Uppsala, Sweden

* Corresponding author (Elisabet.Borjesson{at}mikrob.slu.se)

Received for publication September 26, 2002. This study examined the long-term fate of the fungicide triticonazole (TTZ; 5-[(4-chlorophenyl)methylene]-2,2-dimethyl-1-(1H-1,2,4-triazol-1-ylmethyl)cyclopentanol) applied at a normal field dose (8.9 g ha-1) via seed treatment, which is the normal alternative in practice. The TTZ was applied to wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) grains as a disinfectant before sowing or spraying on bare soil for comparison and reference to the seed treatment. The seeds were germinated and grown in pots in a greenhouse at 22 ± 3°C. The dissipation of TTZ was studied by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS) analysis of the residues every fourth week until no TTZ could be detected. The recovery for analysis of TTZ in soil was between 98 and 131%, and the quantification level was 0.002 mg kg-1. After 56 d of incubation, 20 and 28% of the TTZ applied remained in the soil and seed treatments, respectively, with corresponding half-lives of 27 and 29 d. The microbial biomass initially decreased in the soil treatment but had recovered after 56 d. The active part of the biomass was not changed during the experimental time. Thus, with respect to dissipation of TTZ and its effect on the soil microbial biomass and activity, no long-lasting difference between soil and seed treatments could be found.

Abbreviations: TTZ, triticonazole


Related articles in JEQ:

This Issue in Journal of Environmental Quality

JEQ 2003 32: 1167-1172. [Full Text]  






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal Journal of Plant Registrations The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2003 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.