HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Related articles in JEQ Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Web of Science (19) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Chaignon, V. Articles by Hinsinger, P. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Chaignon, V. Articles by Hinsinger, P. GeoRef GeoRef Citation Agricola Articles by Chaignon, V. Articles by Hinsinger, P. Related Collections Plant and Soil Interactions Lysimeter/Rhizosphere Studies Ecological Risk Assessment Heavy Metals Soil Pollution

TECHNICAL REPORTS
Heavy Metals in the Environment

A Biotest for Evaluating Copper Bioavailability to Plants in a Contaminated Soil

ENSA.M-INRA, UMR Rhizosphère & Symbiose, Place Viala, F-34060 Montpellier Cedex 1, France

^* Corresponding author (philippe.hinsinger{at}ensam.inra.fr)

Received for publication April 12, 2001. This work aimed at defining the optimal conditions for a novel ecotoxicological test designed for evaluating the bioavailability and phytotoxicity of metals to plants. This biotest, which provided easy access to roots, shoots, and rhizosphere soil, was applied to a vineyard calcareous soil that had been contaminated by the application of Cu fungicides. A preliminary hydroponic experiment comparing various levels of solution Cu concentration enabled us to determine the no observable adverse effects concentration (NOAEC), which was in the range 5 to 20 µM total Cu (0.01–0.06 µM free Cu ion) for rape (Brassica napus L. cv. Goeland). For the biotest, rape was grown in hydroponic conditions for 21 d in pots designed so that plants developed a planar mat of roots at the surface of a polyamide mesh. By then, the plants were transferred for 4 or 8 d onto a 1- or 3-mm-thick soil layer that was separated from the root mat by the mesh and connected to a reservoir of nutrient solution or deionized water via a filter paper wick. An 8-d period was the best option as it enabled plant growth to be significant. The use of 1-mm soil thickness was recommended if the biotest aimed at investigating root-induced changes in the rhizosphere. Although it may cause some artifacts, compared with deionized water, nutrient solution provided better standardized conditions for comparing widely differing soil samples. The studied soil did not induce any Cu phytotoxicity in spite of its fairly large total Cu content.

Abbreviations: DM, dry matter • DTPA, diethylene triaminepentaacetic acid • EDTA, ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid • NOAEC, no observable adverse effects concentration

Related articles in JEQ:

This Issue in Journal of Environmental Quality

JEQ 2003 32: 745-750. [Full Text]