HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Related articles in JEQ Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (9) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Hook, P. B. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Hook, P. B. GeoRef GeoRef Citation Agricola Articles by Hook, P. B. Related Collections Surface Water Quality Watershed and Landscape Processes Wetlands and Aquatic Processes Best Management Practices Water Pollution

TECHNICAL REPORTS
Wetlands and Aquatic Processes

Sediment Retention in Rangeland Riparian Buffers

Department of Land Resources and Environmental Sciences, Montana State University-Bozeman, P.O. Box 173120
Bozeman, MT 59717-3120
215 South 7th Street, Livingston, MT 59047

^* Corresponding author (paulhook{at}earthlink.net)

Received for publication March 22, 2002. Controlling nonpoint-source sediment pollution is a common goal of riparian management, but there is little quantitative information about factors affecting performance of rangeland riparian buffers. This study evaluated the influence of vegetation characteristics, buffer width, slope, and stubble height on sediment retention in a Montana foothills meadow. Three vegetation types (sedge wetland, rush transition, bunchgrass upland) were compared using twenty-six 6- x 2-m plots spanning 2 to 20% slopes. Plots were clipped moderately (10–15 cm stubble) or severely (2–5 cm stubble). Sediment (silt + fine sand) was added to simulated overland runoff 6, 2, or 1 m above the bottom of each plot. Runoff was sampled at 15-s to >5-min intervals until sediment concentrations approached background levels. Sediment retention was affected strongly by buffer width and moderately by vegetation type and slope, but was not affected by stubble height. Mean sediment retention ranged from 63 to >99% for different combinations of buffer width and vegetation type, with 94 to 99% retention in 6-m-wide buffers regardless of vegetation type or slope. Results suggest that rangeland riparian buffers should be at least 6 m wide, with dense vegetation, to be effective and reliable. Narrower widths, steep slopes, and sparse vegetation increase risk of sediment delivery to streams. Vegetation characteristics such as biomass, cover, or density are more appropriate than stubble height for judging capacity to remove sediment from overland runoff, though stubble height may indirectly indicate livestock impacts that can affect buffer performance.

Related articles in JEQ:

This Issue in Journal of Environmental Quality

JEQ 2003 32: 745-750. [Full Text]  

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. D. Ziegler, J. Negishi, R. C. Sidle, P. Preechapanya, R. A. Sutherland, T. W. Giambelluca, and S. Jaiaree Reduction of stream sediment concentration by a riparian buffer: filtering of road runoff in disturbed headwater basins of montane mainland southeast Asia. J. Environ. Qual., January 1, 2006; 35(1): 151 - 162. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]