HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Related articles in JEQ Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (7) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Davis, S. Articles by Pringle, C. M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Davis, S. Articles by Pringle, C. M. Agricola Articles by Davis, S. Articles by Pringle, C. M. Related Collections Surface Water Quality Water Quality Water Pollution

TECHNICAL REPORTS
Surface Water Quality

Macroinvertebrate Biomonitoring in Intermittent Coastal Plain Streams Impacted by Animal Agriculture

^a J.W. Jones Ecological Research Center, Route 2, Box 2324, Newton, GA 31770
^b Dep. of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, Univ. of Georgia, Tifton, GA 31793-0748
^c Institute of Ecology, Univ. of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602-2602

^* Corresponding author (sgollada{at}jonesctr.org)

Received for publication February 18, 2002. Little attention has been given to the ecology of intermittent coastal plain streams in the southeastern United States, and it is not known whether available macroinvertebrate biomonitoring methods reliably detect degradation in these streams. This study compared differences in biomonitoring metrics between reference and agricultural streams, and between the flow period (January–April) and the intermittent flow period (May–December). Percentages of crustaceans, isopods, and Ephemeroptera–Plecoptera–Trichoptera (EPT) were significantly higher at the reference site than the two most impacted sites during the flow period, probably resulting from the abundance of leaf litter and lower temperatures. During this same period, the agriculturally impacted sites had a significantly higher percentage of dipterans—a group that thrives in the silty, nutrient-rich waters. Four metrics (percent Crustacea, Isopoda, Diptera, and EPT) had no overlap between values for the most impacted and the least impacted sites during the flow period, but no metrics were able to detect more discrete differences among sites. Sites were physically and biologically similar during the intermittent period when natural stresses (i.e., stagnant water, high temperatures, low dissolved oxygen) were high, with many metrics, such as percentages of dominant family, burrowers, chironomids, and dipterans becoming similar at all sites. Our findings indicate that development of a better understanding of invertebrate fauna in reference conditions and of the natural variation in intermittent streams is necessary to develop effective biomonitoring programs for these systems.

Abbreviations: BMP, best management practice • EPT, Ephemeroptera–Plecoptera–Trichoptera

Related articles in JEQ:

This Issue in Journal of Environmental Quality

JEQ 2003 32: 745-750. [Full Text]  

This article has been cited by other articles:

				T. K. Muenz, S. W. Golladay, G. Vellidis, and L. L. Smith Stream buffer effectiveness in an agriculturally influenced area, southwestern georgia: responses of water quality, macroinvertebrates, and amphibians. J. Environ. Qual., September 1, 2006; 35(5): 1924 - 1938. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]