|
|
||||||||
a Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Soils and Crops Research and Development Centre, 2560 Hochelaga Boulevard, Sainte-Foy, Québec, Canada G1V 2J3
b McCain Foods Limited, 317 Main Street, Florenceville, New Brunswick, Canada E7L 3G6
c Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Atlantic Cool Climate Crops Research Centre, Brookfield Road, P.O. Box 39088, St-John's, Newfoundland, Canada A1E 5Y7
d Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Potato Research Centre, P.O. Box 20280, Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada E3B 4Z7
* Corresponding author (Belangergf{at}agr.gc.ca)
Received for publication April 12, 2002. Nitrogen loss by leaching is a major problem, particularly with crops requiring large amounts of N fertilizer. We evaluated the effect of N fertilization and irrigation on residual soil nitrate following potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) harvests in the upper St-John River valley of New Brunswick, Canada. Soil nitrate contents were measured to a 0.90-m depth in three treatments of N fertilization (0, 100, and 250 kg N ha-1) at two on-farm sites in 1995, and in four treatments of N fertilization (0, 50, 100, and 250 kg N ha-1) at four sites for each of two years (1996 and 1997) with and without supplemental irrigation. Residual soil NO3N content increased from 33 kg NO3N ha-1 in the unfertilized check plots to 160 kg NO3N ha-1 when 250 kg N ha-1 was applied. Across N treatments, residual soil NO3N contents ranged from 30 to 105 kg NO3N ha-1 with irrigation and from 30 to 202 kg NO3N ha-1 without irrigation. Residual soil NO3N content within the surface 0.30 m was related (R2 = 0.94) to the NO3N content to a 0.90-m depth. Estimates of residual soil NO3N content at the economically optimum nitrogen fertilizer application (Nop) ranged from 46 to 99 kg NO3N ha-1 under irrigated conditions and from 62 to 260 kg NO3N ha-1 under nonirrigated conditions, and were lower than the soil NO3N content measured with 250 kg N ha-1. We conclude that residual soil NO3N after harvest can be maintained at a reasonable level (<70 kg NO3N ha-1 ) when N fertilization is based on the economically optimum N application.
Abbreviations: Nop, economically optimum nitrogen fertilizer application
Related articles in JEQ:
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N. Hong, P. C. Scharf, J. G. Davis, N. R. Kitchen, and K. A. Sudduth Economically Optimal Nitrogen Rate Reduces Soil Residual Nitrate J. Environ. Qual., January 25, 2007; 36(2): 354 - 362. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Olivier, J.-P. Goffart, and J.-F. Ledent Threshold Value for Chlorophyll Meter as Decision Tool for Nitrogen Management of Potato Agron. J., April 11, 2006; 98(3): 496 - 506. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| The SCI Journals | Agronomy Journal | Crop Science | |||
| Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education |
Vadose Zone Journal | ||||
| Soil Science Society of America Journal | Journal of Plant Registrations | The Plant Genome | |||