HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Related articles in JEQ Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (6) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Nord, E. A. Articles by Lanyon, L. E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Nord, E. A. Articles by Lanyon, L. E. Agricola Articles by Nord, E. A. Articles by Lanyon, L. E. Related Collections Animal Waste Watershed and Landscape Processes Ecosystem Management Nutrient Cycling Nutrient Management

TECHNICAL REPORTS
Landscape and Watershed Processes

Managing Material Transfer and Nutrient Flow in an Agricultural Watershed

^a Intercollege Program in Ecology and Dep. of Crop and Soil Sciences, The Pennsylvania State Univ., 116 ASI Building, University Park, PA 16802
^b Dep. of Crop and Soil Sciences, The Pennsylvania State Univ., 116 ASI Building, University Park, PA 16802

^* Corresponding author (lel{at}psu.edu)

Received for publication February 20, 2002. Place-based resource management, such as watershed or ecosystem management, is being promoted to replace the media-focused approach for achieving water quality protection. We monitored the agricultural area of a 740-ha watershed to determine the nature and scale of farm material transfers, N and P balances, and farmer decisions that influenced them. Using field data and farmer interviews we found that 3 of 15 farms, emphasizing hog, dairy, or cash crops with poultry production, accounted for more than 80% of the inputs and outputs of N and P for the 362-ha agricultural area (332 ha of managed cropland and animal facilities). Feed for hogs (38% each of total N and P) and manure applied to fields as part of the cash crop and poultry operation (28 and 38% of total N and P, respectively) were the dominant inputs. No crops grown in the watershed were fed to animals in the watershed and more manure nutrients were applied from animals outside than from those in the watershed. A strategic decision by the hog farmer to begin marketing finished hogs changed the material transfers and nutrient balances more than tactical decisions by other farmers in allocating manure to cropland. Since the components of agricultural production were not all interconnected, the fundamental assumption of place-based management programs is not well-suited to this situation. Alternative approaches to managing the effect of agriculture on water quality should consider the organization of agricultural production and the role of strategic decisions in controlling farm nutrient balances.

Abbreviations: DP, dissolved orthophosphate phosphorus • MCRSW, Mahantango Creek Research Subwatershed • TN, total nitrogen • TP, total phosphorus

Related articles in JEQ:

This Issue in Journal of Environmental Quality

JEQ 2003 32: 377-382. [Full Text]  

This article has been cited by other articles:

				N. A. Slaton, K. R. Brye, M. B. Daniels, T. C. Daniel, R. J. Norman, and D. M. Miller Nutrient Input and Removal Trends for Agricultural Soils in Nine Geographic Regions in Arkansas J. Environ. Qual., September 1, 2004; 33(5): 1606 - 1615. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]